首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study.
【24h】

Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study.

机译:中枢皮质区的电刺激治疗中枢性疼痛:电生理和PET研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The clinical, electrophysiological and haemodynamic effects of precentral gyrus stimulation (PGS) as a treatment of refractory post-stroke pain were studied in 2 patients. The first patient had a right hemibody pain secondary to a left parietal infarct sparing the thalamus, while the second patient had left lower limb pain developed after a right mesencephalic infarct. In both cases, spontaneous pain was associated with hyperpathia, allodynia and hypoaesthesia in the painful territory involving both lemniscal and extra-lemniscal sensory modalities in patient 1, extra-lemniscal sensory modality only in patient 2. Both patients were treated with electrical PGS by means of a 4-pole electrode, the central sulcus being per-operatively located using the phase-reversal of the N20 wave of somatosensory evoked potentials. No sensory side effect, abnormal movement or epileptic seizure were observed during PGS. The analgesic effects were somatotopically distributed according to the localization of electrode on motor cortex. A satisfactory long-lasting pain control (60-70% on visual analog scale) as well as attenuation of nociceptive reflexes were obtained during PGS in the first patient. Pain relief was less marked and only transient (2 months) in patient 2, in spite of a similar operative procedure. In this patient, in whom PGS eventually evoked painful dysethesiae, no attenuation of nociceptive RIII reflex could be evidenced during PGS. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was studied using emission tomography (PET) with O-labeled water. The sites of CBF increase during PGS were the same in both patients, namely the thalamus ipsilateral to PGS, cingulate gyrus, orbito-frontal cortex and brainstem. CBF increase in brainstem structures was greater and lasted longer in patient 1 while patient 2 showed a greater CBF increase in orbito-frontal and cingular regions. Our results suggest that PGS-induced analgesia is somatotopically mediated and does not require the integrity of somatosensory cortex and lemniscal system. PGS analgesic efficacy may be mainly related to increased synaptic activity in the thalamus and brainstem while changes in cingulate gyrus and orbito-frontal cortex may be rather related to attentional and/or emotional processes. The inhibitory control on pain would involve thalamic and/or brainstem relays on descending pathways down to the spinal cord segments, leading to a depression of nociceptive reflexes. Painful dysesthesiae during stimulation have to be distinguished from other innocuous sensory side effects, since they may compromise PGS efficacy.
机译:在2例患者中研究了中央前回刺激(PGS)治疗难治性中风后的临床,电生理和血液动力学影响。第一例患者的右半身疼痛是继发于丘脑的左顶壁梗死继发,而第二例患者的右中脑梗塞后出现了左下肢疼痛。在这两种情况下,自发性疼痛均与疼痛区域中的病情增生,异常性疼痛和感觉低下有关,患者1的双侧和双侧超感觉模式均在患者2中发生。两种患者均通过电PGS进行了治疗通过使用N20波的体感诱发电位的相位反转,可操作地定位4极电极的中央沟。在PGS期间未观察到感觉副作用,异常运动或癫痫发作。根据电极在运动皮层上的位置,镇痛作用在躯体部位分布。在第一例患者中,PGS期间获得了令人满意的持久疼痛控制(在视觉模拟量表上为60-70%)以及伤害感受反射。尽管有相似的手术程序,但患者2的疼痛缓解程度较差,仅有短暂的(2个月)。在该患者中,PGS最终引起痛苦的感觉异常,PGS期间未发现伤害性RIII反射减弱。使用带有O标记水的断层扫描(PET)研究了脑血流量(CBF)。两名患者在PGS期间CBF升高的部位相同,即与PGS同侧的丘脑,扣带回,眶额皮质和脑干。患者1脑干结构的脑血流增加更大,持续时间更长,而患者2在眼眶-额叶和扣带区域脑血流增加更大。我们的结果表明,PGS诱导的镇痛是由体位介导的,不需要体感皮层和神经系统的完整性。 PGS的止痛功效可能主要与丘脑和脑干的突触活动增加有关,而扣带回和眶额皮质的变化可能与注意力和/或情绪过程有关。对疼痛的抑制性控制将涉及丘脑和/或脑干在下降途径至脊髓节段的中继通路上转移,从而导致伤害感受反射的降低。刺激期间的痛性感觉异常必须与其他无害的感觉副作用区分开,因为它们可能会损害PGS的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号