...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain management >Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following gynecological surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
【24h】

Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management following gynecological surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

机译:芬太尼离子电渗透皮系统与吗啡静脉内自控镇痛在妇科手术后的疼痛处理:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) with morphine intravenous (iv.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for pain management following gynecological surgery. Methods: Two-open-label, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group studies (n = 1142) were conducted that compared fentanyl ITS with morphine iv. PCA for postoperative pain. The subgroup of gynecological surgery patients from each trial was utilized for this meta-analysis (n = 604). Of these patients, 295 received fentanyl ITS (40 ug/dose) and 309 received morphine iv. PCA (1 mg/dose) for up to 72 h. Efficacy measures included the patient global assessment (PGA) and the investigator global assessment (IGA) of the method of pain control. Results: Gynecological surgery patients (n = 604) included in this meta-analysis had a mean age of 45 years, were predominantly Caucasian (65%) and had a mean body mass index of 29 mg/kg2. There were statistically significantly more patients treated with fentanyl ITS and more investigators who rated their pain control method as 'excellent' on the PGA at 24 h (49.3 vs 37.4%, respectively; p = 0.0029) and IGA at the last'assessment (59.5 vs 38.0%, respectively; p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with morphine iv. PCA at the last assessment. Conclusion: Following gynecological surgery, patients and investigators were more satisfied (had a higher percent of an 'excellent' rating on the PGA and IGA, respectively) with fentanyl ITS than morphine iv. PCA as a method of pain control.
机译:目的:比较患者控制的芬太尼离子电渗透皮系统(ITS)和吗啡静脉内(iv。)患者控制的镇痛剂(PCA)在妇科手术后进行疼痛控制的疗效和安全性。方法:进行了两个开放标签,多中心,随机,主动控制的平行组研究(n = 1142),将芬太尼ITS与吗啡静脉注射进行了比较。 PCA用于术后疼痛。每个试验的妇科手术患者亚组均用于这项荟萃分析(n = 604)。在这些患者中,295例接受芬太尼ITS(40 ug /剂量),309例接受吗啡静脉注射。 PCA(1毫克/剂量)长达72小时。疗效措施包括患者总体疼痛评估(PGA)和研究者总体疼痛控制方法的评估(IGA)。结果:纳入该荟萃分析的妇科手术患者(n = 604)平均年龄为45岁,主要为白种人(65%),平均体重指数为29 mg / kg2。统计学上有更多的患者接受芬太尼ITS治疗,并且有更多的研究者对他们的疼痛控制方法在24小时的PGA上评价为“优秀”(分别为49.3 vs 37.4%; p = 0.0029)和在最后一次评估时的IGA(59.5)。与吗啡相比,分别为38.0%,p <0.0001)。最后一次评估的PCA。结论:妇科手术后,患者和研究者对芬太尼ITS的满意度比吗啡iv更高(分别在PGA和IGA上的“优秀”评级百分比更高)。 PCA作为控制疼痛的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号