首页> 外文期刊>Sleep medicine >The Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) study: Health-care utilization and cost findings
【24h】

The Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) study: Health-care utilization and cost findings

机译:嗜睡症的负担(BOND)研究:医疗保健利用和成本调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize health-care utilization, costs, and productivity in a large population of patients diagnosed with narcolepsy in the United States. Methods: This retrospective, observational study using data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan? Research Databases assessed 5. years of claims data (2006-2010) to compare health-care utilization patterns, productivity, and associated costs among narcolepsy patients (identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD9) narcolepsy diagnosis codes) versus matched controls. A total of 9312 narcolepsy patients (>18. years of age, continuously insured between 2006 and 2010) and 46,559 matched controls were identified. Results: Compared with controls, narcolepsy subjects had approximately twofold higher annual rates of inpatient admissions (0.15 vs. 0.08), emergency department (ED) visits w/o admission (0.34 vs. 0.17), hospital outpatient (OP) visits (2.8 vs. 1.4), other OP services (7.0 vs. 3.2), and physician visits (11.1 vs. 5.6; all p<. 0.0001). The rate of total annual drug transactions was doubled in narcolepsy versus controls (26.4 vs. 13.3; p<. 0.0001), including a 337% and 72% higher usage rate of narcolepsy drugs and non-narcolepsy drugs, respectively (both p<. 0.0001). Mean yearly costs were significantly higher in narcolepsy compared with controls for medical services (?8346 vs. ?4147; p<. 0.0001) and drugs (?3356 vs. ?1114; p<. 0.0001). Conclusions: Narcolepsy was found to be associated with substantial personal and economic burdens, as indicated by significantly higher rates of health-care utilization and medical costs in this large US group of narcolepsy patients.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是表征在美国诊断为发作性睡病的大量患者的医疗保健利用率,成本和生产率。方法:这项回顾性观察研究使用了来自Truven Health Analytics MarketScan的数据?研究数据库评估了5.年的索赔数据(2006-2010年),以比较发作性睡病患者(由国际疾病分类,第九次修订版(ICD9)发作性睡病诊断代码确定)与匹配的对照组之间的医疗保健利用模式,生产力和相关费用。共鉴定了9312例发作性睡病患者(> 18岁,在2006年至2010年间连续投保)和46,559例匹配的对照。结果:与对照组相比,发作性睡病患者的年住院率(0.15 vs. 0.08),急诊科(ED)无入院率(0.34 vs. 0.17),医院门诊(OP)的年发病率高出约两倍。 1.4),其他OP服务(7.0与3.2)和医师就诊(11.1与5.6;所有p <0.0001)。发作性睡病患者与对照组相比,年度药物总交易率翻了一番(26.4 vs. 13.3; p <0.0001),其中发作性睡病药物和非发作性睡病药物的使用率分别提高了337%和72%(p <。 0.0001)。发作性睡病的年均费用明显高于医疗服务的对照组(8346 vs.4147; p <0.0001)和药物(3356 vs.1114; p <0.0001)。结论:发作性睡病被发现与大量的个人和经济负担有关,这是由美国这一大的发作性睡病患者群体的医疗保健利用率和医疗费用显着提高所表明的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号