首页> 外文期刊>Sleep >Actigraphy validation with insomnia.
【24h】

Actigraphy validation with insomnia.

机译:书法验证失眠。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Actigraphy, a method of inferring sleep from the presence or absence of wrist movement, has been well validated against polysomnography in trials with people without insomnia. However, the small amount of literature on validation with insomniacs has revealed an actigraphy bias toward overscoring sleep. The current validation trial with insomniacs used the largest number of subjects to date in such research and attracted participants with diverse demographic characteristics. DESIGN: People with insomnia slept 1 night in the laboratory while simultaneously being monitored by polysomnography, actigraphy (high-sensitivity algorithm of the Mini Mitter AW64 Actiwatch), and morning sleep diary. SETTING: Sleep disorders center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 57 volunteers from the community, 26 men and 31 women, ranging in age from 21 to 87 years. All participants satisfied conservative criteria for insomnia. The sample included subjects with primary insomnia, subjects with comorbid insomnia,and hypnotic users with current insomnia complaints. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Actigraphy was successfully validated on 4 measures of sleep pattern--number of awakenings, wake time after sleep onset, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency percentage--based on nonsignificant mean differences and significant correlation between actigraphy and polysomnography. Sleep-onset latency with actigraphy was not significantly different from polysomnography but was weakly correlated with polysomnography. Hypnotic use contributed to actigraphic overscoring of sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Actigraphy proved to be a satisfactory objective measure of sleep on 4 of 5 sleep parameters, but these results are specific to this particular instrument using this particular algorithm and should not be construed as a blanket endorsement of actigraphy for measuring insomnia.
机译:研究目的:肌动描记法是一种根据是否有腕部运动来推断睡眠的方法,在没有失眠症患者的试验中,针对多导睡眠图已得到充分验证。然而,关于失眠症验证的少量文献显示,书法学偏向于过度睡眠。当前的失眠症​​验证试验在此类研究中使用了迄今为止最多的受试者,并吸引了具有不同人口统计学特征的参与者。设计:失眠症患者在实验室睡了1晚,同时接受了多导睡眠监测仪,心动描记仪(Mini Mitter AW64 Actiwatch的高灵敏度算法)和早晨睡眠日记的监控。地点:睡眠障碍中心。参与者:共有来自社区的57位志愿者,男性26位,女性31位,年龄从21岁到87岁不等。所有参与者均符合保守的失眠标准。样本包括患有原发性失眠的受试者,患有合并症的失眠的受试者以及目前有失眠症的催眠使用者。干预措施:N / A。测量和结果:根据4种睡眠模式的成功测量方法来验证书法是否正确-觉醒次数,开始发作后的醒来时间,总睡眠时间和睡眠效率百分比-基于无显着性的均值差异以及书法和多导睡眠图之间的显着相关性。眼动描记法的睡眠发作潜伏期与多导睡眠图无显着差异,但与多导睡眠图的相关性较弱。催眠使用导致活动性睡眠过度。结论:书法被证明是对5个睡眠参数中的4个进行睡眠的令人满意的客观量度,但是这些结果是特定于使用此特定算法的特定仪器的,因此不应被解释为用于测量失眠的书法的一揽子认可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号