...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Left ventricular mechanical assist devices and cardiac device interactions: an observational case series.
【24h】

Left ventricular mechanical assist devices and cardiac device interactions: an observational case series.

机译:左心室机械辅助装置和心脏装置的相互作用:一个观察病例系列。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for treatment of refractory heart failure. A majority of such patients have implanted cardiac devices, namely implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (CRT-P) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. However, potential interactions between LVADs and cardiac devices in this category of patients remain unknown. METHODS: We reviewed case records and device logs of 15 patients with ICDs or CRT-P or CRT-D devices who subsequently had implantation of a VentrAssist LVAD (Ventracor Ltd., Chatswood, Australia) as destination therapy or bridge to heart transplantation. Pacemaker and ICD lead parameters before and after LVAD implant were compared. In addition, ventricular tachyarrhythmia event logs and potential electromagnetic interference reports were evaluated. RESULTS: Right ventricular (RV) sensing decreased in the first 6 months post-LVAD. Mean R-wave amplitude preimplant was 10.9 +/- 5.25 mV compared with 7.2 +/- 3.4 mV during follow-up (P = 0.02). RV impedance also decreased from 642 +/- 240 ohms at baseline to 580 +/- 212 ohms at follow-up (P = 0.007). There was a significant increase in RV stimulation threshold following implantation of the LVAD from 0.8 +/- 0.6 V at baseline to 1.4 +/- 1.0 V in the first 6 months postimplant (P = 0.01). A marked increase in ventricular tachyarrhythmia burden was observed in three patients. One patient displayed electromagnetic interference between the LVAD and defibrillator, resulting in inappropriate defibrillation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: LVADs have a definite impact on cardiac devices in respect with alteration of lead parameters, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and electromagnetic interference.
机译:背景:非搏动性左心室辅助设备(LVAD)越来越多地用于治疗难治性心力衰竭。这些患者中的大多数已植入心脏设备,即植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)或心脏再同步治疗起搏器(CRT-P)或心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)设备。然而,在这类患者中LVAD与心脏装置之间的潜在相互作用仍然未知。方法:我们回顾了15例ICD,CRT-P或CRT-D设备的患者的病例记录和设备日志,这些患者随后植入了VentrAssist LVAD(Ventracor Ltd.,Chatswood,澳大利亚)作为目的地治疗或通向心脏移植的桥梁。比较了LVAD植入前后的Pacemaker和ICD导联参数。此外,还评估了室性心律失常事件日志和潜在的电磁干扰报告。结果:LVAD后的前6个月,右心室(RV)感觉下降。植入前的平均R波振幅为10.9 +/- 5.25 mV,而随访期间的平均值为7.2 +/- 3.4 mV(P = 0.02)。 RV阻抗也从基线时的642 +/- 240欧姆降低到随访时的580 +/- 212欧姆(P = 0.007)。 LVAD植入后,RV刺激阈值从基线的0.8 +/- 0.6 V显着增加到植入后的前6个月的1.4 +/- 1.0 V(P = 0.01)。三名患者观察到室性快速性心律失常负担明显增加。一名患者显示LVAD和除颤器之间存在电磁干扰,从而导致不适当的除颤治疗。结论:LVADs对心脏设备的铅参数,心室快速性心律失常和电磁干扰的改变有一定的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号