首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Right atrial appendage versus Bachmann's bundle stimulation: a two-year comparative study of electrical parameters in myotonic dystrophy type-1 patients.
【24h】

Right atrial appendage versus Bachmann's bundle stimulation: a two-year comparative study of electrical parameters in myotonic dystrophy type-1 patients.

机译:右心耳与巴赫曼束刺激:对强直性营养不良1型患者电参数的两年比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: We performed a two-year follow-up comparative study of long-term electrical parameters between the right atrial appendage (RAA) and Bachmann's Bundle (BB) stimulation in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1) patients. METHODS: Twenty-five MD1 patients (18 men; age: 54 +/- 13 years) with no difference in the electrical parameters between the RAA site and the BB region at implantation were randomized into two groups: in group I (13 patients; age: 52 +/- 14 years; four women) the atrial lead was placed in the RAA and in group II (12 patients, age: 56 +/- 12 years, three women) the lead was placed in the BB region. Measurements of electrical parameters were recorded at follow-up intervals of 6 weeks and then 12 and 24 months postimplant. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant different in P-wave amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance values between the two groups at 6 weeks. At 24 months follow-up, the intrinsic P-wave amplitude was 2.05 +/- 1.45 mV in the RAA group versus 3.28 +/- 1.09 mV in the BB group (P < 0.05); the pacing threshold was 1.85 +/- 1.8 V in the RAA group versus 0.50 +/- 0.39 V in the BB group (P = 0.03); there were no differences in the atrial impedance between the two groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In a direct two-year follow-up comparison between the RAA and BB atrial pacing sites, we showed a statistically significant increased pacing threshold and decreased intrinsic P-wave amplitude during RAA stimulation in MD1 patients.
机译:目的:我们对强直性肌营养不良1型(MD1)患者的右心耳(RAA)和巴赫曼束(BB)刺激之间的长期电参数进行了为期两年的随访比较研究。方法:25例MD1患者(18名男性;年龄:54 +/- 13岁)在植入时RAA部位和BB区之间的电参数无差异,被随机分为两组:第一组(13例;第二组)。年龄:52 +/- 14岁;四名女性)将心房导线置于RAA中;在第二组(12例患者,年龄:56 +/- 12岁,三名女性)中,导线置于BB区。在植入后6周,然后12和24个月的随访间隔中记录电参数的测量。结果:两组在6周时的P波振幅,起搏阈值和阻抗值在统计学上没有显着差异。在随访24个月时,RAA组的固有P波振幅为2.05 +/- 1.45 mV,而BB组为3.28 +/- 1.09 mV(P <0.05)。 RAA组的起搏阈值为1.85 +/- 1.8 V,而BB组为0.50 +/- 0.39 V(P = 0.03);在随访期间两组之间的心房阻抗无差异。结论:在RAA和BB心房起搏部位之间的直接两年随访比较中,我们显示了在MD1患者的RAA刺激过程中,起搏阈值和内在P波振幅均有统计学意义的显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号