首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Choice of Approach for Appendicectomy: A Meta-analysis of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.
【24h】

Choice of Approach for Appendicectomy: A Meta-analysis of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

机译:阑尾切除术方法的选择:开放式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although laparoscopic appendicectomy has been performed since 1983, the optimal approach for appendicectomy is still under debate. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials between 1995 and 2006 was undertaken. Studies were analyzed overall and in 2 subgroups (pre-2000 and post-2000) to examine for changes in outcomes with increased laparoscopic experience. Operation time was significantly longer for laparoscopy and hospital stay was shorter. Operating time reduced markedly for laparoscopy on subgroup analysis. The risks of postoperative ileus and wound infection are lower for laparoscopy. Perhaps paradoxically, the risk of intra-abdominal abscess development is significantly raised with laparoscopy with an odds ratio of 2.26 (P=0.0002). Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe and effective method of treating acute appendicitis. This meta-analysis shows improvement in the outcomes of laparoscopy with increasing laparoscopic experience but open surgery appears to still confer benefits, especially in terms of intra-abdominal abscess incidence.
机译:尽管自1983年以来已进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术,但对于阑尾切除术的最佳方法仍存在争议。对1995年至2006年之间的所有随机对照试验进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析。整体和两个亚组(2000年之前和2000年之后)对研究进行了分析,以检查随着腹腔镜经验增加而导致的结局变化。腹腔镜手术时间明显更长,住院时间也更短。进行亚组分析的腹腔镜手术时间明显减少。腹腔镜检查术后肠梗阻和伤口感染的风险较低。也许自相矛盾的是,腹腔镜检查显着提高了腹腔内脓肿发展的风险,比值比为2.26(P = 0.0002)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术是治疗急性阑尾炎的一种安全有效的方法。这项荟萃分析显示,随着腹腔镜经验的增加,腹腔镜检查的结果也有所改善,但是开放手术似乎仍可带来益处,尤其是在腹腔内脓肿的发病率方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号