首页> 外文期刊>Surgery >Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: An analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.
【24h】

Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: An analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.

机译:中,远端胆管癌手术切除的预后因素:55例导管和radial骨切缘意义的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The surgical outcome of middle and/or distal bile duct cancer remains unsatisfactory. Although the resectional margin is known to be a predictive factor, the prognostic significance of a positive ductal margin and other radial margin has never been evaluated independently. Methods The clinicopathologic data of 55 patients who had undergone surgical resection for middle and/or distal bile duct cancer between 1987 and 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. The surgical procedures consisted of pancreatoduodenectomy in 42 patients (76%), extrahepatic bile duct resection in 8 patients (15%), major hemihepatectomy (Hx) in 3 patients (5%), and pancreatoduodenectomy plus Hx in 2 patients (4%). In all the patients, intraoperative diagnosis of the ductal margins was performed using frozen sections. Twenty-one clinicopathologic factors, including the status of the ductal margins and of other radial margins, were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The overall 5-year survival rateand the median survival time were 24% and 38 months, respectively. There were 4 (7%) postoperative deaths. Fifteen of the remaining 51 patients (29%) were determined to have positive hepatic-side ductal margins during operation, and 14 of them underwent additional resection of the bile duct (1.6[range, 1-3] times, on average). As a result, hepatic-side ductal margin (hm) and duodenal-side ductal margin were found to be positive in 6 and 0 patients on the final pathologic analysis, respectively. Two of the 6 patients (33%) with positive hm have developed ductal recurrence so far, but the status of hm was not found to be a significant predictor. The depth of neoplastic invasion into the bile duct wall, pancreatic invasion, radial margin, and blood transfusion were significant prognostic factors by the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that the depth of neoplastic invasion and blood transfusion were the independent prognostic factors. Conclusions In the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer, it is of importance to secure a negative radial margin, although it may be less beneficial to obtain a negative hm. Surgeons should make efforts to obtain negative radial margins and to avoid blood transfusion.
机译:背景技术中和/或远端胆管癌的手术结果仍然不令人满意。尽管已知切缘是预测因素,但从未单独评估积极的导管切缘和其他radial骨切缘的预后意义。方法回顾性分析1987年至2003年间55例中,远端胆管癌手术切除患者的临床病理资料。手术方法包括42例(76%)胰十二指肠切除术,8例(15%)肝外胆管切除术,3例(5%)的大半肝切除术(Hx)和2例(4%)的胰十二指肠切除术加Hx 。在所有患者中,使用冰冻切片进行术中导管切缘的诊断。使用单因素和多因素分析评估了二十一种临床病理因素,包括导管边缘和其他radial骨边缘的状态。结果5年总生存率和中位生存时间分别为24%和38个月。术后死亡4例(7%)。其余51例患者中有15例(29%)在手术期间被确定为肝侧导管切缘阳性,其中14例接受了额外的胆管切除术(平均1.6倍,1-3次)。结果,在最终病理分析中,分别有6例和0例患者的肝侧导管边缘(hm)和十二指肠侧导管边缘为阳性。到目前为止,在hm阳性的6例患者中,有2例(33%)发生了导管复发,但是hm的状态未发现是重要的预测指标。单因素分析显示,肿瘤侵犯胆管壁的深度,胰腺侵犯,radial骨边缘和输血是重要的预后因素。多因素分析显示,肿瘤浸润深度和输血是独立的预后因素。结论在中,远端胆管癌的治疗中,确保阴性radial骨边缘很重要,尽管获得阴性hm的益处可能较小。外科医生应努力获得负的radial骨切缘,并避免输血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号