首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: A retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
【24h】

Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: A retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术在当地社区医院的安全性和可行性:与常规的四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) by retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) in a local community hospital. METHODS: SILC was introduced and performed in 57 patients for benign gallbladder diseases. Their clinical data were compared with those of 62 patients treated with CLC. They included patient demographic data and operative outcomes. RESULTS: SILC was attempted in 57 patients and 52 cases (91.2%) were successfully completed. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay in the SILC group was significantly shorter compared with CLC (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SILC has been successfully introduced in a local community hospital. The safety and feasibility was also confirmed. The SILC procedure may become 1 standard option for the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是通过与当地社区医院常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)进行回顾性比较,评估单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的安全性和可行性。方法:对57例良性胆囊疾病患者进行了SILC治疗。他们的临床数据与62例接受CLC治疗的患者进行了比较。他们包括患者的人口统计学数据和手术结果。结果:57例患者尝试了SILC,成功完成52例(91.2%)。两组在手术时间,失血量和术后并发症方面无统计学差异。与CLC相比,SILC组的住院时间明显短(P <0.0001)。结论:SILC已成功引入当地社区医院。安全性和可行性也得到确认。 SILC程序可能成为治疗良性胆囊疾病的一种标准选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号