首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Turkish Journal of Surgery >Prospective randomized comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with new facilitating maneuver vs. conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

【2h】

Prospective randomized comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with new facilitating maneuver vs. conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译：单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Objective:We aimed to investigate the technical feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with our new facilitative maneuver and to compare it with the gold standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

机译：目的：我们旨在研究采用新的便利性手术的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术（SILC）的技术可行性，并将其与金标准的四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）进行比较。

著录项

期刊名称 Turkish Journal of Surgery
作者
Recep Aktimur; Kerim Güzel; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Kadir Yıldırım; Elif Çolak;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2016(32),1
年度 2016
页码 23–29
总页数 7
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类外科学;
关键词
Single-incision conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique;

机译：单切口;常规;腹腔镜;胆囊切除术;技术;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J] . Melissa S. Phillips, Jeffrey M. Marks, Kurt Roberts, Surgical Endoscopy . 2012,第5期

机译：传统四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果
2. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. [J] . Melissa S Phillips, Jeffrey M Marks, Kurt Roberts, Surgical Endoscopy . 2012,第5期

机译：传统的四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果。
3. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J] . MarksJ.M., PhillipsM.S., TacchinoR., Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2013,第6期

机译：单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与改善美容评分相关，但疝气发生率明显升高：传统的多端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机，多中心，单盲试验的一年结果
4. Tci propofol vs. Vima sevoflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy [C] . Jaoua H., Zghidi S.M., Darmoul S. and Fadhel K. Ben World Congress of Total Intravenous Anaesthesia . 2009

机译：腹腔镜胆囊切除术的TCI异丙酚与Vima七氟醚
5. Surgeons' Expertise During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Expert-Novice Comparison [D] . Ghaderi, Iman. 2018

机译：外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间的专业知识：专家新手比较
6. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Laura Evers, Nicole Bouvy, Dion Branje, -1

机译：单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术：系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . 2016

机译：单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术：系统评价和荟萃分析

Prospective randomized comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with new facilitating maneuver vs. conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅