...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: A retrospective comparison with open surgery
【24h】

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: A retrospective comparison with open surgery

机译:腹腔镜近端胃切除术空肠介入治疗近端胃部胃癌:与开放手术的回顾性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The incidence of cancer in the proximal third of the stomach is increasing. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) seems an attractive option for the treatment of early-stage proximal gastric cancer but has not gained wide acceptance because of technical difficulties, including the prevention of severe reflux. In this study, we describe our technique for LPG with jejunal interposition (LPG-IP) and evaluate its safety and feasibility. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the data of patients with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LPG-IP (n = 22) or the same procedure with open surgery (OPG-IP; n = 68) between January 2008 and September 2011. Short-term surgical variables and outcomes were compared between the groups. The reconstruction method was the same in both groups, with creation of a 15 cm, single-loop, jejunal interposition for anastomosis. Results: There were no differences in patient or tumor characteristics between the groups. Operation time was longer in the LGP-IP group (233 vs. 201 min, p = 0.0002) and estimated blood loss was significantly less (20 vs. 242 g, p < 0.0001). The average number of harvested lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups (17 vs. 20). There also were no differences in the incidence of leakage at the esophagojejunostomy anastomosis (9.1 vs. 7.4 %) or other postoperative complications (27 vs. 32 %). The number of times additional postoperative analgesia was required was significantly less in the LPG-IP group compared with the OPG-IP group (2 vs. 4, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: LPG-IP has equivalent safety and curability compared with OPG-IP. Our results imply that LPG-IP may lead to faster recovery, better cosmesis, and improved quality of life in the short-term compared with OPG-IP. Because of the limitations of retrospective analysis, a further study should be conducted to obtain definitive conclusions.
机译:背景:胃近端三分之一处的癌症发病率正在增加。腹腔镜近端胃切除术(LPG)似乎是治疗早期近端胃癌的一种有吸引力的选择,但由于技术上的困难,包括预防严重的反流,并未得到广泛的接受。在这项研究中,我们描述了空肠插入LPG的技术,并评估了其安全性和可行性。方法:在这项回顾性分析中,我们回顾了2008年1月至2011年9月间接受LPG-IP(n = 22)或以相同的开放式手术(OPG-IP; n = 68)进行手术的近端胃癌患者的数据。比较两组之间的短期手术变量和结果。两组的重建方法相同,创建了一个15厘米的单环空肠吻合术。结果:两组之间的患者或肿瘤特征无差异。 LGP-IP组的手术时间更长(233 vs. 201分钟,p = 0.0002),估计失血量明显更少(20 vs. 242 g,p <0.0001)。两组之间平均收集的淋巴结数目没有差异(17 vs. 20)。食管空肠吻合术(9.1 vs. 7.4%)或其他术后并发症(27 vs. 32%)的漏出率也没有差异。与OPG-IP组相比,LPG-IP组需要额外的术后镇痛次数明显减少(2 vs. 4,p <0.0001)。结论:与OPG-IP相比,LPG-IP具有同等的安全性和可固化性。我们的结果表明,与OPG-IP相比,LPG-IP在短期内可能会导致更快的恢复,更好的美容和改善的生活质量。由于回顾性分析的局限性,应该进行进一步的研究以获得明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号