首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Effect of collateral blood flow on patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke
【24h】

Effect of collateral blood flow on patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke

机译:侧支血流对接受急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的患者的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE - : Our aim was to determine the relationships between angiographic collaterals and diffusion/perfusion findings, subsequent infarct growth, and clinical outcome in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke. METHODS - : Sixty patients with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score of 0 or 1 and internal carotid artery/M1 occlusion at baseline were evaluated. A blinded reader assigned a collateral score using a previous 5-point scale, from 0 (no collateral flow) to 4 (complete/rapid collaterals to the entire ischemic territory). The analysis was dichotomized to poor flow (0-2) versus good flow (3-4). Collateral score was correlated with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, diffusion-weighted imaging volume, perfusion-weighted imaging volume (Tmax ≥6 seconds), TICI reperfusion, infarct growth, and modified Rankin Scale score at day 90. RESULTS - : Collateral score correlated with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (P=0.002) and median volume of tissue at Tmax ≥6 seconds (P=0.009). Twenty-nine percent of patients with poor collateral flow had TICI 2B-3 reperfusion versus 65.5% with good flow (P=0.009). Patients with poor collaterals who reperfused (TICI 2B-3) were more likely to have a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at 90 days) compared with patients who did not reperfuse (odds ratio, 12; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-98). There was no difference in the rate of good functional outcome after reperfusion in patients with poor collaterals versus good collaterals (P=1.0). Patients with poor reperfusion (TICI 0-2a) showed a trend toward greater infarct growth if they had poor collaterals versus good collaterals (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS - : Collaterals correlate with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, perfusion-weighted imaging volume, and good reperfusion. However, target mismatch patients who reperfuse seem to have favorable outcomes at a similar rate, irrespective of the collateral score. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION - : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01349946.
机译:背景与目的-:我们的目的是确定接受血管内缺血性卒中治疗的患者的血管造影侧支与扩散/灌注结果,随后的梗塞生长以及临床结局之间的关系。方法-:评估了60例脑梗死溶栓(TICI)评分为0或1,颈内动脉/ M1闭塞的患者。失明的读者使用以前的5分制来分配抵押品评分,范围从0(无抵押品流)到4(完整/快速的抵押品到整个缺血区域)。将分析结果分为不良流量(0-2)与良好流量(3-4)。间接评分与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表,弥散加权成像量,灌注加权成像量(Tmax≥6秒),TICI再灌注,梗死生长和改良的兰金量表评分在第90天时相关。评分与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(P = 0.002)和Tmax≥6秒时的组织中位数(P = 0.009)相关。侧流不良的患者中有29%进行了TICI 2B-3再灌注,而具有良好血流的患者为65.5%(P = 0.009)。与没有再灌注的患者(再灌注(TICI 2B-3))相比,没有再灌注的患者(TICI 2B-3)在90天时更可能具有良好的功能预后(改良Rankin量表评分为0-2)(优势比为12; 95%置信区间) ,1.6-98)。不良侧支与良好侧支的患者在再灌注后良好的功能预后率没有差异(P = 1.0)。再灌注不良(TICI 0-2a)的患者,如果抵押品相对于抵押品良好,则梗塞增长趋势更明显(P = 0.06)。结论-:侧支与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表基线,灌注加权成像量和良好的再灌注相关。然而,无论侧支评分如何,重新灌注的靶位错配患者似乎都有相似的好转率。临床试验注册-:URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01349946。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号