首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
【24h】

Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.

机译:小样本配对研究中比例差异的置信区间构建。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Paired dichotomous data may arise in clinical trials such as pre-/post-test comparison studies and equivalence trials. Reporting parameter estimates (e.g. odds ratio, rate difference and rate ratio) along with their associated confidence interval estimates becomes a necessity in many medical journals. Various asymptotic confidence interval estimators have long been developed for differences in correlated binary proportions. Nevertheless, the performance of these asymptotic methods may have poor coverage properties in small samples. In this article, we investigate several alternative confidence interval estimators for the difference between binomial proportions based on small-sample paired data. Specifically, we consider exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for rate difference via inverting a score test. The exact unconditional confidence interval guarantees the coverage probability, and it is recommended if strict control of coverage probability is required. However, the exact method tends to be overly conservative and computationally demanding. Our empirical results show that the approximate unconditional score confidence interval estimators based on inverting the score test demonstrate reasonably good coverage properties even in small-sample designs, and yet they are relatively easy to implement computationally. We illustrate the methods using real examples from a pain management study and a cancer study.
机译:成对的二分数据可能会出现在临床试验中,例如试验前/试验后比较研究和等效试验。在许多医学期刊中,报告参数估计值(例如优势比,比率差和比率比)及其关联的置信区间估计值成为必要条件。长期以来,人们一直在开发各种渐近置信区间估计器,以用于相关二进制比例的差异。但是,这些渐近方法的性能可能在小样本中具有较差的覆盖范围。在本文中,我们基于小样本配对数据研究了二项式比例之间差异的几种替代置信区间估计量。具体来说,我们通过倒置分数测试来考虑比率差的确切和近似无条件置信区间。精确的无条件置信区间可确保覆盖概率,因此建议如果需要严格控制覆盖概率。但是,确切的方法往往过于保守且对计算的要求很高。我们的经验结果表明,即使在小样本设计中,基于得分测试反演的近似无条件得分置信区间估计值也显示出相当好的覆盖范围,但它们相对容易实现计算。我们使用来自疼痛管理研究和癌症研究的真实例子来说明这些方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号