首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score.
【24h】

Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score.

机译:验证了美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)的运动评分和国家急性脊髓损伤研究(NASCIS)的运动评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: In this study the motor scores of 62 consecutive acute spinal cord-injured patients were retrospectively reviewed. OBJECTIVE: The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores, compared with the conventional motor scores, was retrospectively assessed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study scores has not as yet been confirmed. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive adult patients admitted within 7 days of acute spinal cord injury between April, 1983, and September, 1992, were evaluated. The motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage of each of the American Spinal Injury Association and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores were compared with those of the conventional motor score. From the initial and final motor score, the motor deficit percentage and motor recovery percentage were calculated. There were 38 patients with cervical and thoracic lesions, 12 patients with dorso-lumbar lesions, and 12 patients with lower lumbar lesions. The average follow-up period was 41 months. RESULTS: Both the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were representative of the conventional motor score for the evaluation of the motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage in all levels (P < 0.0001). The differences in all correlation coefficients between the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were not statistically significant in all levels and in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores can both be used for the neurological quantification of motor deficit and motor recovery.
机译:研究设计:在这项研究中回顾性分析了62例连续的急性脊髓损伤患者的运动评分。目的:回顾性评估美国脊髓损伤协会和美国国家急性脊髓损伤研究的运动评分与常规运动评分的可靠性。背景数据摘要:美国脊髓损伤协会和美国急性脊髓损伤研究评分的可靠性尚未得到证实。方法:对1983年4月至1992年9月在急性脊髓损伤后7天内连续收治的62例成年患者进行评估。将美国脊髓损伤协会和美国国家急性脊髓损伤研究的运动评分中的运动障碍百分比和运动恢复百分比与常规运动评分进行了比较。从初始和最终运动评分,计算运动不足百分比和运动恢复百分比。颈胸疾病38例,腰腰部病变12例,下腰部病变12例。平均随访期为41个月。结果:美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分和国家急性脊髓损伤研究运动评分均代表了常规运动评分,以评估所有水平的运动缺陷率和运动恢复率(P <0.0001)。美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分与国家急性脊髓损伤研究运动评分之间所有相关系数的差异在所有水平和每个组中均无统计学意义。结论:美国脊髓损伤协会和国家急性脊髓损伤研究运动评分均可以用于运动缺陷和运动恢复的神经学量化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号