...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion: threaded devices alone versus vertical cages plus posterior instrumentation.
【24h】

Lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion: threaded devices alone versus vertical cages plus posterior instrumentation.

机译:后路椎间融合术后的腰椎矢状轮廓:单独使用螺纹装置与垂直笼加后路器械。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: An observational radiographic study examining lumbar sagittal contour of patients undergoing posterior interbody arthrodesis. OBJECTIVES: To compare operative alterations of lumbar sagittal contour after posterior interbody fusion using threaded interbody devices alone versus vertical cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Technique-related alterations of lumbar sagittal contour during interbody arthrodesis have received little attention in the spinal literature. METHODS: Standing lumbar radiographs were measured for preoperative and postoperative segmental lordosis at levels undergoing posterior interbody arthrodesis using either stand-alone side-by-side threaded devices or vertical cages combined with posterior transpedicular compression instrumentation. Sagittal plane segmental correction (or loss of correction) was calculated and statistically compared. RESULTS: The radiographs of 30 patients (34 spinal segments) undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral arthrodesis were compared. Seventeen patients (18 segments) had undergone interbody fusion using threaded cages,whereas 13 patients (16 segments) underwent fusion using vertically oriented mesh cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation. Preoperative segmental lordosis averaged 8 degrees for both groups. For patients undergoing fusion with threaded cages, there was a mean lordotic loss of 3 degrees/segment. For patients undergoing fusion with vertically oriented mesh cages combined with posterior compression instrumentation,there was a mean lordotic gain of 5 degrees/segment. This difference in segmental sagittal plane contour was highly significant (P = 0.00). CONCLUSION: Threaded fusion devices placed under interbody distraction with the endplates parallel fail to preserve or reestablish segmental lordosis. Vertical cages, however, when combined with posterior compression instrumentation, not only maintain segmental lordosis, but also can correct sagittal plane deformity.
机译:研究设计:一项放射学观察性研究,检查接受后椎间关节固定术的患者的腰椎矢状轮廓。目的:比较单独使用螺纹椎间融合器与垂直笼结合后路加压器械后路椎间融合术后腰椎矢状轮廓的手术改变。背景技术概述:在椎间关节固定术中,与技术有关的腰椎矢状轮廓改变在脊柱文献中很少受到关注。方法:采用独立的并排螺纹装置或垂直笼结合后路椎弓根加压器械,对站立的腰椎X线照片进行术前和术后节段性脊柱前凸进行水平的椎体间关节固定术。计算矢状平面节段性矫正(或丧失矫正)并进行统计比较。结果:比较了30例腰椎或腰s部关节固定术的患者的X线照片。 17名患者(18个节段)使用了带螺纹的笼子进行椎间融合,而13例患者(16个节段)使用了垂直定向的网状笼子并结合了后路加压器械进行了融合。两组术前节段性脊柱前凸平均为8度。对于使用螺纹笼融合术的患者,平均脊柱前凸损失为3度/节。对于接受垂直网状笼融合并结合后路加压器械融合术的患者,平均脊柱前凸增益为5度/节。节段矢状面轮廓的这种差异非常显着(P = 0.00)。结论:螺纹椎间融合器置于椎间盘牵引下,与端板平行,不能保留或重建节段性脊柱前凸。但是,垂直笼与后加压器械结合使用时,不仅可以保持节段性脊柱前凸,还可以纠正矢状面畸形。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号