...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
【24h】

Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

机译:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术中体感诱发电位监测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter clinical review was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To examine our experience using somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to determine if monitoring of the spinal cord with SSEPs was helpful in identifying reversible causes of neurologic impairment while performing the procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have strongly supported the use of SSEP monitoring during complicated and upper-cervical spine surgery. METHODS: The complete medical records of 163 patients who underwent ACDF, and who were monitored with SSEPs during the procedure between 1995 and 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. A single observer who was uninvolved with patient care abstracted these medical records. Demographic data, length of symptoms, workers' compensation status, primary diagnosis, preoperative neurologic status, number of levels fused, bone graft type, implants used, SSEP findings, postoperative neurologic status, complications, and recovery from complications were recorded. Final neurologic status was determined through phone contact with patients or outpatient charts of patients who could not be contacted personally. RESULTS: There were 3 false positive (1.8%) intraoperative SSEP findings in which SSEP changes intraoperatively did not reflect a neurologic deterioration after surgery. There was 1 false negative (0.6%) in which a new neurologic deficit occurred after surgery, despite no change in SSEP amplitudes during the operation. There were 2 true negatives (1.2%) in which SSEP monitoring showed a preexisting neurologic deficit, which did not change during the operation. CONCLUSION: In no instance were positive SSEP findings clinically useful in alerting the surgeon to potential intraoperative complications. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring is not helpful to the surgeon when performing routine ACDF. Additionally, ACDF is a safe procedure with a low rate of neurologic complications.
机译:研究设计:进行了回顾性的多中心临床评价。目的:回顾我们在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)期间使用体感诱发电位(SSEP)监测的经验,以确定用SSEPs监测脊髓是否有助于在执行该过程时确定可逆性神经损伤的原因。背景数据摘要:最近的研究强烈支持在复杂和上颈椎手术中使用SSEP监测。方法:回顾性分析了1995年至2002年间163例行ACDF并在手术过程中接受SSEP监测的患者的完整医疗记录。一位不关心患者护理的观察者摘录了这些病历。记录人口统计学数据,症状的长度,工人的补偿状况,初步诊断,术前神经系统状况,融合水平,植骨类型,使用的植入物,SSEP结果,术后神经系统状况,并发症以及并发症的恢复情况。通过与患者的电话联系或无法亲自联系的患者的门诊图表确定最终的神经系统状态。结果:术中有3例SSEP假阳性(1.8%),其中术中SSEP改变未反映出手术后神经系统恶化。尽管手术期间SSEP幅度没有变化,但术后仍有1例假阴性(0.6%)出现新的神经系统缺陷。 SSEP监测显示先前存在神经系统缺陷,有2个真实阴性(1.2%),在手术过程中没有改变。结论:在任何情况下,SSEP阳性结果均未在临床上提醒医生注意术中潜在的并发症。进行常规ACDF时,术中SSEP监测对医生没有帮助。此外,ACDF是一种安全的方法,神经系统并发症的发生率低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号