...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Neurology International >A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases
【24h】

A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases

机译:无脊髓病患者前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术中运动和体感诱发电位的作用:连续57例病例分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Although the usage of combined motor and sensory intraoperative monitoring has been shown to improve the surgical outcome of patients with cervical myelopathy, the role of transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (tceMEP) used in conjunction with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in patients presenting with radiculopathy but without myelopathy has been less clear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients (n = 57) with radiculopathy but without myelopathy, undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion at a single institution over the past 3 years, who had intraoperative monitoring with both tceMEPs and SSEPs. Results: Fifty-seven (100%) patients presented with radiculopathy, 53 (93.0%) with mechanical neck pain, 35 (61.4%) with motor dysfunction, and 29 (50.9%) with sensory deficits. Intraoperatively, 3 (5.3%) patients experienced decreases in SSEP signal amplitudes and 4 (6.9%) had tceMEP signal changes. There were three instances where a change in neuromonitoring signal required intraoperative alteration of the surgical procedure: these were deemed clinically significant events/true positives. SSEP monitoring showed two false positives and two false negatives, whereas tceMEP monitoring only had one false positive and no false negatives. Thus, tceMEP monitoring exhibited higher sensitivity (33.3% vs. 100%), specificity (95.6% vs. 98.1%), positive predictive value (33.3% vs. 75.0%), negative predictive value (97.7% vs. 100%), and efficiency (91.7% vs. 98.2%) compared to SSEP monitoring alone. Conclusions: Here, we present a retrospective series of 57 patients where tceMEP/SSEP monitoring likely prevented irreversible neurologic damage. Though further prospective studies are needed, there may be a role for combined tceMEP/SSEP monitoring for patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression without myelopathy.
机译:背景:尽管已证明结合运动和感觉术中术中监测可改善宫颈脊髓病患者的手术效果,但经颅电运动诱发电位(tceMEP)结合体感诱发电位(SSEP)在患者中的作用患有神经根病但无脊髓病的病因尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性回顾了过去3年中在同一机构接受过tceMEP和SSEP术中监护的所有神经根神经病但无脊髓病,颈前路减压和融合的患者(n = 57)。结果:五十七(100%)名患有神经根病的患者,53名(93.0%)患有机械性颈部疼痛,35名(61.4%)患有运动功能障碍和29名(50.9%)患有感觉缺陷。术中3例(5.3%)患者的SSEP信号幅度下降,4例(6.9%)的tceMEP信号改变。在三种情况下,需要改变术中手术过程来改变神经监测信号:这些被认为是临床上重要的事件/真阳性。 SSEP监控显示两个假阳性和两个假阴性,而tceMEP监控只有一个假阳性,没有假阴性。因此,tceMEP监测显示更高的敏感性(33.3%vs. 100%),特异性(95.6%vs. 98.1%),阳性预测值(33.3%vs. 75.0%),阴性预测值(97.7%vs. 100%),与仅SSEP监控相比,效率和效率(分别为91.7%和98.2%)。结论:在此,我们回顾性分析了57例患者,其中tceMEP / SSEP监测可能预防了不可逆的神经系统损害。尽管需要进一步的前瞻性研究,但tceMEP / SSEP联合监测可能对未患有脊髓病的颈椎前路减压患者进行监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号