首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Comparison of Multifidus Muscle Atrophy and Trunk Extension Muscle Strength: Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation.
【24h】

Comparison of Multifidus Muscle Atrophy and Trunk Extension Muscle Strength: Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation.

机译:多裂肌萎缩症和躯干伸展肌力量的比较:经皮与开放式椎弓根螺钉固定术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN.: This study was conducted by retrospective case selection and prospective observation of longitudinal changes of the multifidus muscle cross-sectional area and of trunk extension muscle strength in percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixations. OBJECTIVES.: To compare postoperative multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk muscle performance of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation against those of open pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Recent attempts to combine percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with minimally invasive fusion techniques are based on an anecdotal presupposition that percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is superior to its open counterpart. However, the benefits of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are currently poorly defined. METHODS.: Nineteen enrolled patients were divided as follows: 11 in the open pedicle screw fixation group (OPF group) and eight in the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPF group). The preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional area and T2-weighted signal intensity of multifidus muscle were measured by MRI, and trunk extension muscle strength was measured. In addition, various clinical variables were compared between two groups. RESULTS.: There was significant decrease in the cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle in the OPF group. In contrast, the results in the PPF group showed no statistical difference between preoperative results and that of the follow-up MRI. Although percutaneous pedicle screw fixation had positive effects on postoperative trunk muscle performance, clinical outcomes were not significantly different in areas of pain score, JOA score, and patient's opinion regarding the outcome of the surgery. However, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation caused less blood loss, and the proportion of patients who did not need postoperative oral analgesics was greater in the PPF group. CONCLUSIONS.: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation caused less paraspinal muscle damage than open pediclescrew fixation and had positive effects on postoperative trunk muscle performance.
机译:研究设计:本研究是通过回顾性病例选择和前瞻性观察经皮和开放式椎弓根螺钉固定术中多裂肌横截面积的纵向变化和躯干伸展肌的力量进行的。目的:比较经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与开放性椎弓根螺钉固定的术后多指肌萎缩和躯干肌肉性能。背景技术概述:最近尝试将经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与微创融合技术结合起来是基于一个轶事的前提,即经皮椎弓根螺钉固定优于其开放性。但是,目前尚不清楚经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的好处。方法:19例患者按以下方法分为:开放性椎弓根螺钉固定组(OPF组)11例,经皮椎弓根螺钉固定组(PPF组)8例。 MRI测量多裂肌的术前和术后截面积和T2加权信号强度,并测量躯干伸展肌的强度。此外,在两组之间比较了各种临床变量。结果:OPF组的多裂肌横截面积明显减少。相比之下,PPF组的结果显示术前结果与随访MRI结果之间无统计学差异。尽管经皮椎弓根螺钉固定对术后躯干肌肉性能有积极影响,但在疼痛评分,JOA评分和患者对手术结果的看法方面,临床结果并无显着差异。但是,PPF组经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术引起的失血较少,不需要术后口服镇痛药的患者比例更高。结论:经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术比开放椎弓根螺钉固定术对脊柱旁肌的损伤要小,并且对术后躯干肌的性能有积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号