首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial
【24h】

A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial

机译:一项前瞻性,随机对照临床研究,比较了PCM颈椎间盘置换术与颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合术:美国FDA IDE临床试验的2年结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.: Prospective, multicenter, randomized Food and Drug Administration approved investigational device exemption clinical trial. Objective.: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PCM Cervical Disc compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of patients with degenerative spondylosis and neurological symptoms at 1 level between C3-C4 and C7-T1. Summary of Background Data.: Cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of symptomatic cervical spondylosis has been studied in other series. The PCM Cervical Disc is a nonconstrained motion-sparing alternative to ACDF. Methods.: Patients 18 to 65 years of age with single-level symptomatic cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy unresponsive to nonoperative treatment were enrolled, including patients with prior nonadjacent or adjacent single-level fusions. The per-protocol patient sample at 2 years included 342 patients (189 PCM, 153 ACDF). Longitudinal outcomes were comparatively evaluated. Results.: At 2 years postoperatively, clinical measures-neck and arm pain visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and neurological status-were significantly improved from preoperative baselines in both groups. Mean NDI score at 2 years was significantly lower in PCM group (P = 0.029). There were no statistical differences between groups in rates of surgery-related serious adverse events (5.6% PCM, 7.4% ACDF) or secondary surgical procedures (5.2% PCM, 5.4% ACDF). Patients with PCM reported lower dysphagia scores (8.8/100 vs. 12.1/100; P = 0.045) and higher patient satisfaction (82.8/100 vs. 81.4/100). Overall success, a composite endpoint including minimum 20% NDI improvement, no major complications, no neurological worsening, no secondary surgical procedures, and meeting radiographical criteria of motion for PCM and fusion for ACDF, was significantly greater in the PCM group (75.1% vs. 64.9%; P = 0.020). Conclusion.: The treatment of symptomatic single-level cervical spondylosis with PCM achieves clinical outcomes that are at least equivalent to ACDF while maintaining motion. At 2 years, patients with PCM had lower NDI scores, statistically lower rate of prolonged dysphagia, greater patient satisfaction, and superior overall success.
机译:研究设计:前瞻性,多中心,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的研究器械豁免临床试验。目的:评价与前颈椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)相比,PCM颈椎盘治疗C3-C4和C7-T1之间的1级退行性脊柱病和神经系统症状的安全性和有效性。背景数据摘要:在其他系列中也研究了颈椎间盘置换术治疗有症状的颈椎病。 PCM颈椎盘是ACDF的一种无约束运动保留替代方法。方法:招募了18至65岁患有单水平症状性颈椎病并伴有对非手术治疗无反应的神经根病和/或脊髓病的患者,包括先前进行过不相邻或相邻的单水平融合术的患者。 2年时按方案的患者样本包括342名患者(189 PCM,153 ACDF)。纵向结局进行了比较评估。结果:术后2年,两组患者的临床测量指标-颈部和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟量表,颈部残疾指数(NDI),SF-36和神经系统状况-均较术前基线有明显改善。 PCM组2年的平均NDI评分显着降低(P = 0.029)。两组之间在与手术相关的严重不良事件(5.6%PCM,7.4%ACDF)或第二次手术程序(5.2%PCM,5.4%ACDF)的发生率上无统计学差异。 PCM患者的吞咽困难评分较低(8.8 / 100 vs. 12.1 / 100; P = 0.045)和较高的患者满意度(82.8 / 100 vs. 81.4 / 100)。在PCM组中,总体成功,复合终点(包括至少20%的NDI改善,无重大并发症,无神经系统恶化,无二次外科手术以及符合放射线照相标准的PCM运动和ACDF融合)显着提高(75.1%vs 64.9%; P = 0.020)。结论:PCM治疗有症状的单级颈椎病可以在保持运动的同时达到至少与ACDF相当的临床效果。在2年时,PCM患者的NDI评分较低,吞咽困难的延长发生率在统计学上较低,患者满意度更高,总体成功率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号