...
首页> 外文期刊>Southeastern naturalist >Comparing Chemiluminescent and LED Light for Trapping Water Mites and Aquatic Insects
【24h】

Comparing Chemiluminescent and LED Light for Trapping Water Mites and Aquatic Insects

机译:比较化学发光和LED灯诱捕水螨和水生昆虫的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research compared the effectiveness of red, yellow, green, and blue chemiluminescent candies and white light from an LED source in capturing water mites and aquatic insects in a macrophyte bed of a small reservoir. We sought to compare the abundance of organisms captured and to determine whether specific taxa showed a preference for certain colors. A total of 2974 organisms in 19 taxa were collected including 7 water mite genera and 12 other invertebrate taxa. The abundance of Hydrachnida (water mites) in the traps was greater than all other taxa combined. The dominant insect taxa collected were Ephemeroptera and Odonata. No statistically significant inter-taxon preferences for color were found, but overall there was a greater attraction to yellow, green, or white light than to red and blue light. Since white light from the reusable LED source performed as well as yellow or green disposable chemiluminescent candies that are typically used in aquatic traps, submersible LED flashlights could be considered a Suitable alternative.
机译:这项研究比较了红色,黄色,绿色和蓝色化学发光糖果和来自LED光源的白光在捕获小型水库大型植物床中的水螨和水生昆虫方面的有效性。我们试图比较捕获的生物数量,并确定特定的分类单元是否显示出对某些颜色的偏爱。总共收集到19974个分类单元中的2974个生物,包括7个水螨属和12个其他无脊椎动物分类单元。陷阱中水Hy的数量比所有其他类群的总和还多。收集到的主要昆虫分类是星翅目和蜻蜓目。统计学上没有发现分类间对颜色的偏好,但总体而言,对黄色,绿色或白色的光比对红色和蓝色的光具有更大的吸引力。由于来自可重复使用的LED光源的白光与通常用于水生陷阱的黄色或绿色的一次性化学发光糖果一样好,因此潜水LED手电筒可以被认为是一种合适的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号