...
首页> 外文期刊>Skeletal radiology >Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic entheses - A systematic comparison between short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced, fat-saturated sequences
【24h】

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic entheses - A systematic comparison between short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced, fat-saturated sequences

机译:骨盆腔的磁共振成像-短头倒置恢复(STIR)与T1加权,对比增强,脂肪饱和序列之间的系统比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the contribution of contrast material in detecting and evaluating enthesitis of pelvic entheses by MRI. Materials and methods: Sixty-seven hip or pelvic 1.5-T MRIs (30:37 male:female, mean age: 53 years) were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of hamstring and gluteus medius (GM) enthesitis by two readers (a resident and an experienced radiologist). Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast (T1+Gd) images were evaluated by each reader at two sessions. A consensus reading of two senior radiologists was regarded as the gold standard. Clinical data was retrieved from patients' referral form and medical files. Cohen's kappa was used for intra- and inter-observer agreement calculation. Diagnostic properties were calculated against the gold standard reading. Results: A total of 228 entheses were evaluated. Gold standard analysis diagnosed 83 (36 %) enthesitis lesions. Intra-reader reliability for the experienced reader was significantly (p = 0.0001) higher in the T1+Gd images compared to the STIR images (hamstring: k = 0.84/0.45, GM: k = 0.84/0.47). Sensitivity and specificity increased from 0.74/0.8 to 0.87/0.9 in the STIR images and T1+Gd sequences. Intra-reader reliability for the inexperienced reader was lower (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Evidence showing that contrast material improves the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of detecting enthesitis supports its use in this setting.
机译:目的:评估造影剂在MRI检查和评估骨盆腔炎中的作用。材料和方法:两位读者(住院医师和住院医师)回顾性评估了67例髋部或骨盆的1.5-T MRI(男:女:30:37,平均年龄:53岁)的绳肌和臀肌炎(GM)。经验丰富的放射科医生)。每个读者在两个会话中评估了短tau反转恢复(STIR)和T1加权的前后对比(T1 + Gd)图像。两位资深放射科医生的共识读被视为黄金标准。从患者的转诊表格和医疗档案中检索临床数据。 Cohen的kappa用于观察者之间和观察者之间的协议计算。根据金标准读数计算诊断性能。结果:总共评估了228个主题。金标准分析诊断出83例(36%)的脑炎病变。与STIR图像(腿筋:k = 0.84 / 0.45,GM:k = 0.84 / 0.47)相比,有经验的阅读器的阅读器内部可靠性在T1 + Gd图像中显着更高(p = 0.0001)。在STIR图像和T1 + Gd序列中,灵敏度和特异性从0.74 / 0.8增加到0.87 / 0.9。没有经验的阅读器的阅读器内部可靠性较低(p> 0.05)。结论:有证据表明造影剂可提高检测脑炎的可靠性,敏感性和特异性,支持在这种情况下使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号