首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases >Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences
【2h】

Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences

机译:磁共振成像评估强直性脊柱炎患者的急性脊柱炎症:对比增强的T1和短tau倒置恢复(STIR)序列之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To compare the performance of two different MRI sequences—T1 weighted, fat saturated, spin echo after application of contrast medium, and short τ inversion recovery (STIR) sequences—to detect spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). >Methods: Both MRI sequences were performed in 38 patients with active AS and compared using the MRI activity scoring system, ASspiMRI-a. One vertebral unit (VU) was defined as the region between two virtual lines drawn through the middle of each vertebral body. >Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent—0.91 and 0.86 for the Gd-DTPA and STIR sequences, respectively. The overall correlation of the single MRI scores for both sequences was also good (r = 0.84, p = 0.01). The intrarater variance was 6.71 and 9.41 and the interrater variance was 13.16 and 19.04 for the Gd-DTPA and STIR sequences, respectively. The smallest detectable distance was 4.7 and 5.6 for the Gd-DTPA and STIR sequences, respectively. The concordance rate for both sequences was 83.5% (range 80.5–87.7% in the three spinal segments). Inflammatory spinal lesions were found in 10.1% of the VUs in the STIR sequence but not in the T1/Gd-DTPA sequence, while the T1/Gd-DTPA sequence showed inflammatory lesions in 6.4% of the VUs that were found normal by STIR. >Conclusions: Both MRI techniques can evaluate active spinal lesions in patients with AS. More spinal lesions are detected by the STIR sequence, but the reliability between readings and readers is better for the Gd-DTPA sequence. The ASspiMRI-a is a reliable instrument for evaluating acute spinal changes in AS.
机译:>目标:比较两种不同的MRI序列(T1加权,脂肪饱和,应用造影剂后的自旋回波和短τ反转恢复(STIR)序列)在检测患有MRI的患者中的表现强直性脊柱炎(AS)。 >方法:这两种MRI序列均在38例活动性AS患者中进行,并使用MRI活动评分系统ASspiMRI-a进行比较。一个椎骨单位(VU)定义为穿过每个椎体中间的两条虚拟线之间的区域。 >结果:类内相关系数非常好-Gd-DTPA和STIR序列分别为0.91和0.86。两个序列的单个MRI评分的总体相关性也都很好(r = 0.84,p = 0.01)。对于Gd-DTPA和STIR序列,评定者内差异为6.71和9.41,而差异内差异为13.16和19.04。 Gd-DTPA和STIR序列的最小可检测距离分别为4.7和5.6。两个序列的一致性率为83.5%(三个脊柱节段的范围为80.5-87.7%)。在STIR序列中,在10.1%的VU中发现了炎性脊髓损伤,但在T1 / Gd-DTPA序列中未发现炎性脊髓损伤,而在STIR正常的VU中,T1 / Gd-DTPA序列显示出6.4%的炎症损伤。 >结论:两种MRI技术都可以评估AS患者的活动性脊柱病变。 STIR序列可检测到更多的脊柱病变,但对于Gd-DTPA序列,读数和读数器之间的可靠性更高。 ASspiMRI-a是评估AS急性脊柱改变的可靠工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号