首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Productivity cost calculations in health economic evaluations: Correcting for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects
【24h】

Productivity cost calculations in health economic evaluations: Correcting for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects

机译:卫生经济评估中的生产力成本计算:补偿机制和乘数效应的校正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Productivity costs related to paid work are commonly calculated in economic evaluations of health technologies by multiplying the relevant number of work days lost with a wage rate estimate. It has been argued that actual productivity costs may either be lower or higher than current estimates due to compensation mechanisms and/or multiplier effects (related to team dependency and problems with finding good substitutes in cases of absenteeism). Empirical evidence on such mechanisms and their impact on productivity costs is scarce, however. This study aims to increase knowledge on how diminished productivity is compensated within firms. Moreover, it aims to explore how compensation and multiplier effects potentially affect productivity cost estimates. Absenteeism and compensation mechanisms were measured in a randomized trial among Dutch citizens examining the cost-effectiveness of reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment. Multiplier effects were extracted from published literature. Productivity costs were calculated applying the Friction Cost Approach. Regular estimates were subsequently adjusted for (i) compensation during regular working hours, (ii) job dependent multipliers and (iii) both compensation and multiplier effects. A total of 187 respondents included in the trial were useful for inclusion in this study, based on being in paid employment, having experienced absenteeism in the preceding six months and completing the questionnaire on absenteeism and compensation mechanisms. Over half of these respondents stated that their absenteeism was compensated during normal working hours by themselves or colleagues. Only counting productivity costs not compensated in regular working hours reduced the traditional estimate by 57%. Correcting for multiplier effects increased regular estimates by a quarter. Combining both impacts decreased traditional estimates by 29%. To conclude, large amounts of lost production are compensated in normal hours. Productivity costs estimates are strongly influenced by adjustment for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects. The validity of such adjustments needs further examination, however.
机译:与带薪工作相关的生产力成本通常是在卫生技术的经济评估中通过将损失的相关工作日数乘以工资率估算得出的。有人认为,由于补偿机制和/或乘数效应(与团队依赖性和缺勤情况下寻找好的替代品有关),实际的生产率成本可能低于或高于目前的估计。但是,关于这种机制及其对生产率成本影响的经验证据很少。这项研究旨在增加有关如何补偿企业内部生产力下降的知识。此外,它旨在探索补偿和乘数效应如何潜在影响生产率成本估算。在荷兰公民中进行的一项随机试验中,测量了旷工和补偿机制,以研究戒烟补偿费用的成本效益。乘数效应摘自已发表的文献。使用摩擦成本法计算了生产成本。随后对正常估计数进行了以下调整:(i)正常工作时间的报酬;(ii)与工作有关的乘数;(iii)报酬和乘数的影响。共有187名受访者参与了本研究,该研究基于有薪工作,在过去六个月中曾经历过旷工并完成了有关旷工和补偿机制的问卷调查,因此可用于本研究。这些受访者中有超过一半的人说,他们的缺勤是他们自己或同事在正常工作时间内得到的补偿。仅计算在正常工作时间内没有得到补偿的生产率成本,就使传统估计降低了57%。乘数效应的校正使正常估计增加了四分之一。综合这两种影响,传统估计值降低了29%。总而言之,正常时间会补偿大量的生产损失。生产率成本估算受到补偿机制和乘数效应调整的强烈影响。但是,此类调整的有效性需要进一步检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号