首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Using quantile regression to examine the effects of inequality across the mortality distribution in the U.S. counties
【24h】

Using quantile regression to examine the effects of inequality across the mortality distribution in the U.S. counties

机译:使用分位数回归来检验不平等对美国各州死亡率分布的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. has experienced a resurgence of income inequality in the past decades. The evidence regarding the mortality implications of this phenomenon has been mixed. This study employs a rarely used method in mortality research, quantile regression (QR), to provide insight into the ongoing debate of whether income inequality is a determinant of mortality and to investigate the varying relationship between inequality and mortality throughout the mortality distribution. Analyzing a U.S. dataset where the five-year (1998-2002) average mortality rates were combined with other county-level covariates, we found that the association between inequality and mortality was not constant throughout the mortality distribution and the impact of inequality on mortality steadily increased until the 80th percentile. When accounting for all potential confounders, inequality was significantly and positively related to mortality; however, this inequality-mortality relationship did not hold across the mortality distribution. A series of Wald tests confirmed this varying inequality-mortality relationship, especially between the lower and upper tails. The large variation in the estimated coefficients of the Gini index suggested that inequality had the greatest influence on those counties with a mortality rate of roughly 9.95 deaths per 1000 population (80th percentile) compared to any other counties. Furthermore, our results suggest that the traditional analytic methods that focus on mean or median value of the dependent variable can be, at most, applied to a narrow 20 percent of observations. This study demonstrates the value of QR. Our findings provide some insight as to why the existing evidence for the inequality-mortality relationship is mixed and suggest that analytical issues may play a role in clarifying whether inequality is a robust determinant of population health.
机译:在过去的几十年中,美国的收入不平等现象再次出现。关于这种现象对死亡率的影响的证据好坏参半。这项研究在死亡率研究中采用了一种很少使用的方法,即分位数回归(QR),以深入了解正在进行的关于收入不平等是否是死亡率的决定因素的辩论,并研究整个死亡率分布中不平等与死亡率之间的变化关系。分析美国的五年(1998-2002年)平均死亡率与其他县级协变量的数据集,我们发现在整个死亡率分布中,不平等与死亡率之间的关联不是恒定的,并且不平等对死亡率的影响稳定增加到第80个百分点。当考虑所有潜在的混杂因素时,不平等与死亡率呈显着正相关。但是,这种不平等-死亡率关系在整个死亡率分布中并不成立。一系列Wald检验证实了这种不平等-死亡率关系的变化,尤其是在下尾巴和上尾巴之间。基尼系数估计系数的巨大差异表明,不平等对这些县的影响最大,与任何其他县相比,死亡率约为每1000人口9.95例死亡(第80个百分点)。此外,我们的结果表明,关注因变量平均值或中值的传统分析方法最多只能应用于狭窄的20%观察值。这项研究证明了QR的价值。我们的发现为为什么不平等与死亡率关系的现有证据混杂在一起提供了一些见解,并表明分析问题可能在阐明不平等是否是人口健康的有力决定因素方面发挥了作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号