首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Using quantile regression to examine the effects of inequality across the mortality distribution in the U.S. counties
【2h】

Using quantile regression to examine the effects of inequality across the mortality distribution in the U.S. counties

机译:使用量子回归来检查美国县死亡率分布的不平等的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The U.S. has experienced a resurgence of income inequality in the past decades. The evidence regarding the mortality implications of this phenomenon has been mixed. This study employs a rarely used method in mortality research, quantile regression (QR), to provide insight into the ongoing debate of whether income inequality is a determinant of mortality and to investigate the varying relationship between inequality and mortality throughout the mortality distribution. Analyzing a U.S. dataset where the five-year (1998–2002) average mortality rates were combined with other county-level covariates, we found that the association between inequality and mortality was not constant throughout the mortality distribution and the impact of inequality on mortality steadily increased until the 80th percentile. When accounting for all potential confounders, inequality was significantly and positively related to mortality; however, this inequality–mortality relationship did not hold across the mortality distribution. A series of Wald tests confirmed this varying inequality–mortality relationship, especially between the lower and upper tails. The large variation in the estimated coefficients of the Gini index suggested that inequality had the greatest influence on those counties with a mortality rate of roughly 9.95 deaths per 1000 population (80th percentile) compared to any other counties. Furthermore, our results suggest that the traditional analytic methods that focus on mean or median value of the dependent variable can be, at most, applied to a narrow 20 percent of observations. This study demonstrates the value of QR. Our findings provide some insight as to why the existing evidence for the inequality–mortality relationship is mixed and suggest that analytical issues may play a role in clarifying whether inequality is a robust determinant of population health.
机译:美国在过去的几十年里经历了收入不平等的复苏。有关这种现象的死亡影响的证据已被混合。本研究采用了一项越来越多的死亡率研究方法,定量回归(QR),以了解持续辩论的收入不平等是死亡的决定因素,并在整个死亡率分布过程中调查不平等和死亡之间的不同关系。分析了美国数据集,其中五年(1998-2002)平均死亡率与其他县级协变量相结合,我们发现不平等和死亡率之间的关联在整个死亡率分布以及不平等对死亡率的影响稳步下降增加到第80百分位数。在满足所有潜在的混乱者时,不平等与死亡率有显着呈积极关系;然而,这种不平等性死亡关系并没有陷入死亡率分布。一系列沃尔德检验证实了这种不同的不等式死亡关系,特别是在下部和上部尾部之间。基尼指数的估计系数的大变化表明,与任何其他县相比,对每年10万名(80百分位数)的死亡率大约有9.95人死亡率的死亡率最大的影响。此外,我们的结果表明,专注于依赖变量的平均值或中位值的传统分析方法,最多可以应用于狭窄的20%的观察结果。本研究表明了QR的价值。我们的调查结果提供了一些洞察力,为什么现有的不平等性关系的证据是混合的,并表明分析问题可能在澄清不平等是人口健康的强大决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号