首页> 外文期刊>Small >On the lifecycle of nanocomposites: Comparing released fragments and their in-vivo hazards from three release mechanisms and four nanocomposites
【24h】

On the lifecycle of nanocomposites: Comparing released fragments and their in-vivo hazards from three release mechanisms and four nanocomposites

机译:关于纳米复合材料的生命周期:比较三种释放机理和四种纳米复合材料的释放片段及其体内危害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Nanocomposites are the dominating class of nanomaterials to come into consumer contact, and were in general assumed to pose low risk. The first data is now emerging on the exposure from nanocomposites, but little is yet known about their hypothetical nanospecific physiological effects, giving ample room for speculation. For the first time, this comprehensive study addresses these aspects in a systematic series of thermoplastic and cementitious nanocomposite materials. Earlier reports that 'chalking', the release of pigments from weathered paints, also occurs for nanocomposites, are confirmed. In contrast, mechanical forces by normal consumer use or do-it-yourself sanding do not disrupt nanofillers (nanoparticles or nanofibers) from the matrix. Detailed evidence is provided for the nature of the degradation products: no free nanofillers are detected up to the detection threshold of 100 ppm. Sanding powders measuring 1 to 80 ?m in diameter are identified with the original material, still containing the nanofillers. The potential hazard from aerosols generated by sanding nanocomposites up to the nuisance dust limit is also investigated. In-vivo instillation in rats is used to quantify physiological effects on degradation products from abraded nanocomposites, in comparison to the abraded matrix without nanofiller and to the pure nanofiller. In this pioneering and preliminary evaluation, the hazards cannot be distinguished with or without nanofiller. The human hazard emerging from released fragments is studied in vivo, and no differences due to the presence of the nanofillers are indicated. Normal use versus do-it-yourself versus weathering are compared, as well as carbon nanotubes versus nanoparticle fillers, polymer versus inorganic matrices. Among these 12 scenarios, surface-structured fragments were found, but only in one case the degradation was significantly changed by the nanofiller.
机译:纳米复合材料是与消费者接触的主要纳米材料类别,通常被认为具有较低的风险。有关纳米复合物暴露的第一批数据现已浮出水面,但对它们假设的纳米特异性生理效应的了解却很少,为推测提供了充足的空间。这项全面的研究首次在一系列热塑性和胶结纳米复合材料中解决了这些问题。较早的报道证实,纳米复合材料也会发生“粉化”现象,即从风化涂料中释放出颜料。相反,正常消费者使用或自行打磨产生的机械力不会破坏基质中的纳米填料(纳米粒子或纳米纤维)。提供了有关降解产物性质的详细证据:在检测阈值达到100 ppm时,没有检测到游离的纳米填料。直径为1至80 µm的砂光粉仍使用原始材料进行识别,但仍包含纳米填料。还研究了由打磨纳米复合材料产生的浮质直至有害粉尘极限的潜在危害。与没有纳米填料的研磨基质和纯纳米填料相比,大鼠体内滴注用于量化对磨损的纳米复合材料降解产物的生理效应。在这种开创性和初步评估中,使用或不使用纳米填料无法区分危害。在体内研究了从释放的片段中出现的人的危害,没有指出由于存在纳米填料而造成的差异。比较了正常使用,自己动手和耐候性,以及碳纳米管与纳米颗粒填料,聚合物与无机基质的比较。在这12种情况中,发现了表面结构碎片,但只有一种情况是纳米填料显着改变了降解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号