...
首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Using electronic patient records in practice: A focused review of the evidence of risks to the clinical interaction
【24h】

Using electronic patient records in practice: A focused review of the evidence of risks to the clinical interaction

机译:在实践中使用电子病历:对临床相互作用风险证据的集中审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electronic patient records (EPRs) are increasingly being viewed as key to high quality chronic disease management, and have been advocated for epilepsy care. Whether EPRs can really deliver on their promise, however, remains a matter of debate. In this focused review, I highlight one set of risks associated with EPR use: risks to the interaction between health professional and patient. This review summarises a small body of evidence derived from studies that examined - in fine-grained detail - recordings of real consultations. These show that EPRs are often used in ways that prioritise the demands of the system over the needs of the patient. However, they also demonstrate that health professionals sometimes integrate EPRs in ways that enhance the clinical encounter. I argue that we not only need more of this kind of interaction-based research - as opposed to focusing on the single EPR user - but that the findings from these previous studies need to be acted upon. They indicate a need both for the design of EPRs and the training of EPR users to be sensitive to the impact of EPR use on the interaction between health professional and patient.
机译:电子病历(EPR)日益被视为高质量慢性病管理的关键,并被提倡用于癫痫病治疗。但是,EPR能否真正兑现其诺言仍是一个有争议的问题。在这篇重点综述中,我重点介绍了与EPR使用相关的一组风险:医护人员与患者之间相互作用的风险。这篇综述总结了少量研究的证据,这些研究以细粒度的细节检查了真正的咨询记录。这些表明,EPR经常以优先考虑系统需求而不是患者需求的方式使用。但是,他们还证明,卫生专业人员有时会以增强临床经验的方式来整合EPR。我认为我们不仅需要更多此类基于交互的研究(而不是专注于单个EPR用户),而且还需要对这些先前研究的发现进行处理。它们表明EPR的设计和EPR用户的培训都需要对EPR的使用对卫生专业人员和患者之间相互作用的影响敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号