...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. >Pressure pain sensitivity as a marker for stress and pressure pain sensitivity-guided stress management in women with primary breast cancer
【24h】

Pressure pain sensitivity as a marker for stress and pressure pain sensitivity-guided stress management in women with primary breast cancer

机译:压力疼痛敏感性作为原发性乳腺癌女性压力和压力疼痛敏感性指导的压力管理的标志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives. To validate (1) Pressure Pain Sensitivity (PPS) as a marker for stress and (2) a PPS-guided intervention in women with primary Breast Cancer (BC). Methods. (1) A total of 58 women with BC were examined before and after 6 months of intervention. A control group of 165 women office employees was divided in a High Stress Group (HSG, n = 37) and a Low Stress Group (LSG, n = 128) to evaluate the association between PPS, questionnaire-related Quality of Life (QOL) and self-evaluated stress. (2) A PPS-guided stress management program (n = 40) was compared to a Psychosocial Group Intervention (PGI, n = 91) and no treatment (n = 86) with respect to a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire measured QOL. Results. (1) Resting PPS and changes in PPS during the intervention period correlated significantly to EORTC and Short Form 36 (SF 36) main scores: (all p < 0.05). Between BC, HSG and LSG there was a significant and positive correlation with respect to PPS, SF 36 main scores, depression, and clinical stress scores (all p < 0.05). However, the BC group scored significantly lower than both HSG and LSG (both p < 0.05) with respect to self-evaluated stress. (2) The PPS-guided intervention group improved EORTC main score, pain and nausea, when compared to the control groups (all p < 0.05). Conclusions. PPS was positively associated with QOL, which was in contrast to self-evaluated stress. PPS-guided intervention improved QOL in women with breast cancer.
机译:目标。验证(1)压力疼痛敏感性(PPS)作为压力的标志,以及(2)以PPS指导的原发性乳腺癌(BC)妇女干预措施。方法。 (1)干预前后6个月共检查58例BC女性。将165名女性上班族作为对照组,分为高压力组(HSG,n = 37)和低压力组(LSG,n = 128),以评估PPS,与问卷相关的生活质量(QOL)之间的关联和自我评估的压力。 (2)对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(PGI)指导的压力管理程序(n = 40)与心理社会团体干预(PGI,n = 91)和无治疗(n = 86)进行了比较( EORTC)问卷测得的QOL。结果。 (1)静息PPS和干预期间PPS的变化与EORTC和简短表格36(SF 36)的主要得分显着相关:(所有p <0.05)。在BC,HSG和LSG之间,PPS,SF 36主要评分,抑郁和临床压力评分之间存在显着正相关(所有p <0.05)。然而,就自我评估的压力而言,BC组的评分显着低于HSG和LSG(均p <0.05)。 (2)与对照组相比,以PPS为指导的干预组改善了EORTC主要评分,疼痛和恶心(所有p <0.05)。结论PPS与QOL呈正相关,这与自我评估的压力相反。 PPS指导的干预措施可改善乳腺癌女性的生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号