首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing >Comparing Various Multi-Disciplinary Optimization Approaches for Performance Enhancement and Weight Reduction of a Vehicle Chassis Frame
【24h】

Comparing Various Multi-Disciplinary Optimization Approaches for Performance Enhancement and Weight Reduction of a Vehicle Chassis Frame

机译:比较各种多学科优化方法以提高车辆底盘车架的性能和减轻重量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Designing a vehicle chassis involves meeting numerous performance requirements related to various domains such as Durability, Crashworthiness and Noise-Vibration-Harshness (NVH) as well as reducing the overall weight of chassis. In conventional Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) process, experts from each domain work independently to improve the design based on their own domain knowledge which may result in sub-optimal or even non-acceptable designs for other domains. In addition, this may lead to increase in weight of chassis and also result in stretching the overall product development time and cost. Use of Multi-Disciplinary Optimization (MDO) approach to tackle these kind of problems is well documented in industry. However, how to effectively formulate an MDO study and how different MDO formulations affect results has not been touched upon in depth. This study implements various MDO formulations on an established SUV chassis frame for further weight reduction and performance improvement. Results from different MDO formulations are compared and insights are provided into ways of formulating an MDO problem in order to achieve desired results. How the choice of optimization algorithm, number of objectives and constraints etc. affect MDO results is also discussed. 18 component thicknesses are selected based on domain understanding as design variables (DVs) for optimization. Various attributes/load-cases considered during optimization are -bending and torsional stiffness for Durability, global mode shapes from modal analysis for NVH, energy absorption and displacements at specific locations during frontal offset crash for crashworthiness. As a first step, a Design of Experiment (DoE) study is performed for each domain individually and results are analysed to identify conflicting targets. Response Surface (RSM) based optimization method is selected for optimization studies considering time and resource availability. Commercial software package, modeFRONTIER, is used as a process integration, design optimization and data analysis tool. Optimal designs from all MDO studies are compared with each other to evaluate effectiveness of formulations.
机译:设计车辆底盘需要满足与各个领域相关的众多性能要求,例如耐用性,耐撞性和噪声振动性(NVH),以及减轻底盘的整体重量。在传统的计算机辅助工程(CAE)流程中,每个领域的专家都根据自己的领域知识独立工作,以改进设计,这可能导致其他领域的设计不理想甚至不可接受。另外,这可能导致机架的重量增加,并且还导致整个产品开发时间和成本的增加。在行业中,使用多学科优化(MDO)方法来解决这类问题的方法已得到充分证明。但是,如何有效地制定MDO研究以及不同的MDO配方如何影响结果尚未深入探讨。这项研究在已建立的SUV底盘车架上实施了各种MDO配方,以进一步减轻重量并提高性能。比较了来自不同MDO公式的结果,并提供了解决MDO问题的方法的见解,以实现所需的结果。还讨论了优化算法的选择,目标数量和约束等如何影响MDO结果。基于领域的理解,选择18种组件厚度作为设计变量(DV)进行优化。在优化过程中考虑的各种属性/载荷工况包括-耐久性的弯曲和扭转刚度,用于NVH的模态分析的全局模式形状,在正面偏移碰撞过程中特定位置的能量吸收和位移以实现耐撞性。第一步,对每个域分别进行实验设计(DoE)研究,并对结果进行分析以识别冲突的目标。考虑到时间和资源的可用性,选择基于响应面(RSM)的优化方法进行优化研究。商业软件包modeFRONTIER被用作过程集成,设计优化和数据分析工具。将所有MDO研究中的最佳设计相互比较,以评估配方的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号