首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles >Fuel-Savings from Aerodynamic Efficiency Improvements for Combination Tractor-Trailers Relative to Vehicle Speed
【24h】

Fuel-Savings from Aerodynamic Efficiency Improvements for Combination Tractor-Trailers Relative to Vehicle Speed

机译:相对于车速,组合式半挂牵引车的空气动力学效率改进节省了燃料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Commercial, class-8 tractor-trailers were tested to develop a relationship between vehicle speed and fuel savings associated with trailer aerodynamic technologies representative of typical long-haul freight applications. This research seeks to address a concern that many long-distance U.S. freight companies hold that, as vehicle speed is reduced, the fuel savings benefits of aerodynamic technologies are not realized. In this paper, the reductions in fuel consumption were measured using the SAE J1231 test method and thru-engine fueling rates recorded from the vehicle's electronic data stream. Constant speed testing was conducted on road at different speeds and corresponding testing was conducted on track to confirm results. Data was collected at four (4) vehicle speeds: 35, 45, 55, and 62 miles per hour. Two different trailer aerodynamic configurations were evaluated relative to a baseline tractor trailer. Reductions in fuel consumption displayed a strong relationship to vehicle speed, with aerodynamic improvements demonstrating a maximum reduction of fuel consumption of nine (9) percent relative to the baseline at 62 miles per hour. Results at high vehicle speeds are consistent with earlier wind tunnel studies published for trailer aerodynamic technologies. Reductions in fuel consumption demonstrated at 35, 45 and 55 miles per hour are consistent with anticipated performance based on changes in the coefficient of drag for the aerodynamic technology packages tested. At speeds as slow as 35mph, a trailer side skirt and full trailer aerodynamic package demonstrated fuel savings of over 2 and 3 percent, respectively. Fuel savings results at high speeds were relatively insensitive to baseline selection when compared to five (5) different baselines. The relationships derived from the tests provide a good fit (i.e., high R2 values) to mathematical regression models and suggest these curves can be used to estimate reductions in fuel consumption savings for aerodynamic technologies for modern class-8 tractor-trailers operating at different vehicle speeds. When applying the SAE J1321 approach (i.e., use of a control vehicle and calculating fuel savings relative to a baseline), ECU-derived fuel savings generally agree with the gravimetric measurement.
机译:对商用8类牵引车-拖车进行了测试,以建立代表典型的长途货运应用的拖车空气动力学技术在车速和燃油节省之间的关系。这项研究旨在解决许多美国长途货运公司都认为的问题,即随着车速的降低,无法实现空气动力学技术的燃油节省优势。在本文中,使用SAE J1231测试方法测量了燃油消耗的减少量,并从车辆的电子数据流中记录了通过发动机的燃油率。在道路上以不同的速度进行恒速测试,并在赛道上进行相应的测试以确认结果。在四(4)车速下收集数据:每小时35、45、55和62英里。相对于基线牵引车拖车,评估了两种不同的拖车空气动力学配置。燃油消耗的减少与车辆速度密切相关,空气动力学方面的改进表明,相对于每小时62英里的基准,燃油消耗最大减少了百分之九(9)。高车速下的结果与针对拖车空气动力学技术的早期风洞研究一致。根据测试的空气动力学技术套件的阻力系数变化,每小时35、45和55英里处的油耗降低与预期性能一致。在低至35英里/小时的速度下,挂车侧裙板和完整的挂车空气动力学套件分别节省了2%和3%以上的燃油。与五(5)个不同的基准相比,高速节油的结果对基准选择相对不敏感。从测试得出的关系为数学回归模型提供了良好的拟合(即,较高的R2值),并建议这些曲线可用于估算在不同车辆上运行的现代8类拖挂车的空气动力学技术所节省的油耗。速度。当使用SAE J1321方法时(即使用控制车辆并计算相对于基准的燃油节省量),ECU得出的燃油节省量通常与重量测量结果一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号