首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. >Sense of coherence and psychiatric morbidity in terms of anxiety and depression in patients with major depression before and after electric convulsive treatment.
【24h】

Sense of coherence and psychiatric morbidity in terms of anxiety and depression in patients with major depression before and after electric convulsive treatment.

机译:在电惊厥治疗前后,对重度抑郁症患者的焦虑和抑郁感具有连贯性和精神病的感觉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The specific aim of this study was to explore if the Sense of Coherence (SOC) Scale reflects and overlaps with standardized psychiatric assessments of depression and anxiety leading to the main hypothesis that the degree of depression decreases while the SOC scores remain stable. Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of major depression according to Axis I in DSM-IV and planned electric convulsive treatment (ECT) participated in the study. The clinician-rated instruments, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Global Assessment of Function (GAF), and the self-assessment instruments such as SOC and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale-Self Rating Scale for Affective Syndromes (CPRS-S-A) were used before and after the treatment. The patients showed statistically significant improvements in clinician-rated depression (p < 0.001) and functional status (p < 0.001), and in self-rated anxiety (p = 0.001) and depression (p = 0.003). There was no significant improvement in SOC (p = 0.213). No significant correlations were found between the SOC scores and any of the measures except for GAF after treatment (r = 0.57, p = 0.039); the lower the SOC scores the greater was the functional dysfunction. In conclusion, the SOC Scale seems not to be a measure of psychopathology in terms of depression or anxiety merely.
机译:这项研究的具体目的是探讨连贯感量表(SOC)量表是否与抑郁症和焦虑症的标准化精神病学评估相吻合,从而得出主要假设,即抑郁程度降低而SOC评分保持稳定。 15名根据DSM-IV中的Axis I诊断为重度抑郁症并计划进行电惊厥治疗(ECT)的患者参加了该研究。临床医师评定的仪器,蒙哥马利·阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和全球功能评估(GAF),以及自我评估工具,例如SOC和情感综合征综合心理病理量表-自我评定量表(CPRS-SA)在治疗前后使用。这些患者在临床医师评定的抑郁症(p <0.001)和功能状态(p <0.001),自评焦虑症(p = 0.001)和抑郁症(p = 0.003)上显示出统计学上的显着改善。 SOC没有显着改善(p = 0.213)。治疗后除GAF外,SOC评分与其他任何测量指标均无显着相关性(r = 0.57,p = 0.039); SOC分数越低,功能障碍越大。总而言之,SOC量表似乎不能仅根据抑郁或焦虑来衡量心理病理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号