首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles >Drag Reduction using Base Flaps Combined with Vortex Generators and Fluidic Oscillators on a Bluff Body
【24h】

Drag Reduction using Base Flaps Combined with Vortex Generators and Fluidic Oscillators on a Bluff Body

机译:在钝体上使用基础襟翼结合涡流发生器和流体振荡器来减少阻力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The potential of drag reduction on a generic model of a heavy vehicle using base flaps operated in combination with flow control devices is investigated experimentally. Base flaps are well known as drag reduction devices for bluff bodies and heavy road vehicles. However, for optimal performance their deflection angle should typically not exceed 12°. In this paper the primary goal is to increase the usable range of the deflection angles by applying flow control. The secondary goal is to find the most suitable method for flow control. A comparison is made between triangular vortex generators and fluidic oscillators as passive and active flow control methods, respectively. Vortex generators have the advantage of being very simple devices but produce drag. Fluidic oscillators are also quite simple devices but require additional air supply. Their advantages are that they can be activated when needed and that they do not generate additional drag. The wind tunnel model used corresponds to the geometrical dimensions of a 10% scaled model yielding a Reynolds number of 7·10~5. Various flap angles with a length of 100mm were attached to the base. Other geometrical parameters such as the height of the vortex generators were also varied as well as their axial position. The results show that base flaps deflected by 20° combined with vortex generators reduce drag by 26% compared to the baseline. At deflection angles of 22.5° the passive and active concepts show similar drag reduction. Furthermore, possibilities for performance improvement of the active concept are identified.
机译:实验研究了在重型车辆的通用模型上使用与流量控制装置结合操作的基础襟翼的减阻潜力。底盖是众所周知的减振器和重型公路车辆的减阻装置。但是,为了获得最佳性能,它们的偏转角通常不应超过12°。本文的主要目标是通过应用流量控制来增加偏转角的可用范围。第二个目标是找到最合适的流量控制方法。在三角涡发生器和流体振荡器分别作为被动和主动流动控制方法之间进行了比较。涡流发生器的优点是设备非常简单,但会产生阻力。流体振荡器也是非常简单的设备,但需要额外的空气供应。它们的优点是可以在需要时将其激活,并且不会产生额外的阻力。所使用的风洞模型对应于10%比例模型的几何尺寸,其雷诺数为7·10〜5。长度为100mm的各种襟翼角均安装在基座上。其他几何参数(例如涡流发生器的高度)及其轴向位置也有所变化。结果表明,与基线相比,偏转20°的基础襟翼与涡流发生器相结合可将阻力降低26%。在偏转角为22.5°时,被动和主动概念显示出相似的减阻效果。此外,确定了改进主动概念的性能的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号