首页> 外文期刊>Science education >Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas
【24h】

Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas

机译:在学校科学实验室中通过学习写作来学习写作:帮助中学生在学习核心思想时发展议论文能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examined how students' science-specific argumentative writing skills and understanding of core ideas changed over the course of a school year as they participated in a series of science laboratories designed using the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) instructional model. The ADI model is a student-centered and writing-intensive approach to laboratory instruction. The study was conducted in two middle school and two high school courses offered at a university-affiliated laboratory school located in the southeast USA. The intervention took place over two semesters and consisted of at least eight laboratory activities in each course. Student learning gains were measured using a science content assessment and a science-specific argumentative writing assessment that were administered at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. Changes in student performance on the two assessments over time indicate that the students' science-specific argumentative writing skills and their understanding of core scientific ideas improved over the course of intervention. Furthermore, students who participated in a greater number of ADI activities demonstrated greater and more consistent improvement in their writing. The implications of the study describe ways to enhance students' science proficiencies during school science laboratories and include recommendations for future research.
机译:这项研究调查了学生参加一个使用论据驱动型探究(ADI)教学模型设计的一系列科学实验室时,他们在特定科学领域的议论性写作技巧和对核心思想的理解如何变化。 ADI模型是一种以学生为中心且写作密集的实验室教学方法。这项研究是在位于美国东南部的一所大学附属实验室学校的两所中学和两所高中课程中进行的。干预进行了两个学期,每个课程至少包括八次实验室活动。学生的学习成绩是通过在学年开始,中期和结束时进行的科学内容评估和针对特定科学的论据写作评估来衡量的。随着时间的推移,两次评估中学生表现的变化表明,在干预过程中,学生特定于科学的议论性写作技巧和对核心科学思想的理解得到了提高。此外,参加更多ADI活动的学生在写作方面表现出更大,更一致的进步。该研究的意义描述了在学校科学实验室期间提高学生科学能力的方法,并包括对未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号