...
首页> 外文期刊>Science education >Improving Middle School Science Learning Using Diagrammatic Reasoning
【24h】

Improving Middle School Science Learning Using Diagrammatic Reasoning

机译:利用图解推理改善中学科学学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We explored whether existing curricula can be adapted to increase students' skills at comprehending and learning from diagrams using an intervention delivered by regular middle-school teachers in intact classrooms. Ninety-two teachers in three states implemented our modified materials over six curricular units from two publishers: Holt (a reading-focused curriculum) and Full Option Science System (FOSS) (an inquiry-focused curriculum). Results were compared between two interventionsone based on selected principles of cognitive science (cognitive-science-based) that included instruction in diagram comprehension and one providing professional development in science content only (content-only)and a business-as-usual control. We analyze posttest items involving different degrees of reliance on diagrams to show how instruction in diagram comprehension can improve comprehension of diagrams during reasoning. At the classroom level, there were significant advantages of the cognitive-science-based intervention over both content-only and business-as-usual with large effect sizes in all FOSS units (d = 0.41-0.52), but only one Holt unit (d = 0.11). Analyses by type of diagram suggested these effects were largest for transfer to diagrams from an uninstructed domain. Further analyses of high-stakes state test scores available for the participants implementing the Holt units showed improved use of diagrams (d = 0.45-0.66). Results suggest that making sense of visualizations (diagrams) is not effortless and self-evident, but that students who receive supports for comprehending can improve their comprehension, and the learning can transfer to new domains. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:我们探讨了在普通教室中由普通中学老师提供的干预措施,是否可以修改现有课程,以提高学生的理解力和从图表中学习的技能。三个州的92名教师在来自两个出版商的六个课程单元中实施了我们的改进材料:Holt(阅读类课程)和Full Option Science System(FOSS)(研读型课程)。比较了两种基于选定的认知科学原理(基于认知科学)的干预措施的结果(基于认知科学),其中包括对图表理解的指导,而一项干预措施仅提供科学内容的专业发展(仅内容)和常规业务。我们分析涉及图表的不同程度的后期测试项目,以显示图表理解中的指令如何在推理过程中提高对图表的理解。在教室一级,基于认知科学的干预相对于仅按内容进行和按常规进行均具有显着优势,在所有FOSS单元中均具有较大的效应量(d = 0.41-0.52),但只有一个Holt单元( d = 0.11)。按图类型进行的分析表明,这些影响对于从非指令域转移到图上的影响最大。可用于实施Holt单元的参与者的高风险状态测试分数的进一步分析显示,图表的使用得到了改善(d = 0.45-0.66)。结果表明,可视化效果(图表)并非毫不费力且不言而喻,但获得理解支持的学生可以提高他们的理解力,并且学习可以转移到新的领域。 (C)2016威利期刊公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号