...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of public health >Research ethics committees: a comparative study of assessment of ethical dilemmas.
【24h】

Research ethics committees: a comparative study of assessment of ethical dilemmas.

机译:研究伦理委员会:伦理困境评估的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research ethics committees (REC) constitute an important instrument for the regulation of biomedical research involving human beings. The purposes of this work were to study the ethical reasoning in RECs and to ascertain whether the composition of RECs has any bearing on the decisions subsequently made by them. We used a postal questionnaire, containing authentic cases of research ethical dilemmas, sent to the ten RECs in Sweden (n = 124) and to comparison groups consisting of 200 randomly selected medical researchers, 200 randomly selected healthcare politicians and 200 randomly selected district nurses. The average response rate was 68%. A difference was found in how REC members assess a project in comparison with researchers, healthcare politicians and district nurses. Differences depended on the type of project assessed. The study indicates that membership in RECs may exert a normative influence on its members. It is proposed that this investigation should be followed up by a study with a qualitative design.
机译:研究伦理委员会(REC)是规范涉及人类的生物医学研究的重要工具。这项工作的目的是研究REC中的道德推理,并确定REC的组成是否对他们随后做出的决定有影响。我们使用了邮政调查表,其中包含真实的研究伦理困境案例,已发送至瑞典的10个REC(n = 124),并发送至由200名随机选择的医学研究人员,200名随机选择的医疗政客和200名随机选择的地区护士组成的比较组。平均回应率为68%。与研究人员,医疗保健政客和地区护士相比,REC成员评估项目的方式有所不同。差异取决于所评估项目的类型。研究表明,REC中的成员资格可能对其成员产生规范影响。建议在此调查之后应进行定性设计研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号