首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Workplace hazard identification and management: The case of an underground mining operation
【24h】

Workplace hazard identification and management: The case of an underground mining operation

机译:工作场所危害识别与管理:地下采矿作业案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper uses the findings from two workshops conducted with 77 employees of an underground mining operation in Western Australia in April and May 2011. Risk management requires all managers and employees to identify hazards in their work environments. Managers assume that their employees have sufficient knowledge and skills to successfully identify not only obvious but also emerging hazards. For this study, two workshops were conducted using an action research methodology. In the first workshop, "Hazard Identification" it was found that the range of workplace hazards the staff could identify was extensive by some groups and very limited by others. For example length of experience underground did not predetermine an ability to identify hazards. Some of the longest serving and those in supervisory positions identified few hazards. Most teams identified 8-12 hazards under each of four categories within a typology: obvious, trivial, emerging and hidden hazards. However, the team with the least experience were unable to identify more than four obvious, two trivial, five emerging and three hidden hazards in their work areas. In workshop two, "Managing Workplace Hazards", the teams showed a range of abilities to complete the task with one team (with an average 12 years experience underground) unable to identify any strategies to control the list of emerging hazards and one team of managers displaying limited skills. Given these results there is a need to provide further training for all managers and employees in hazard identification and management.
机译:本文使用2011年4月和2011年5月在西澳大利亚州的一家地下采矿作业的77名员工举办的两次研讨会中得出的结论。风险管理要求所有经理和员工识别其工作环境中的危害。管理人员认为其员工具有足够的知识和技能,可以成功地识别不仅明显的危险,而且还可以成功识别正在出现的危险。对于这项研究,使用行动研究方法进行了两次研讨会。在第一个讲习班“危害识别”中,发现员工可以识别的工作场所危害范围在某些群体中是广泛的,而在另一些群体中则是非常有限的。例如,地下经验的长度并不能确定识别危害的能力。任职时间最长的人和担任监督职务的人很少发现危险。大多数团队在一种类型的四个类别中分别识别出8-12种危害:明显,琐碎,新兴和隐藏的危害。但是,经验最少的团队无法在其工作区域中识别出四个以上的明显危险,两个琐碎的危险,五个新兴的危险和三个隐藏的危险。在第二讲习班“管理工作场所的危害”中,团队展示了一系列完成任务的能力,其中一个团队(平均在地下工作12年)无法确定任何控制新出现的危害的方法,而一个团队的经理显示有限的技能。鉴于这些结果,有必要为所有经理和雇员提供关于危害识别和管理的进一步培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号