首页> 外文期刊>San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review >WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? THE LET-DOWN THAT IS THE LANDMARK MONSANTO V. GEERTSON CASE
【24h】

WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? THE LET-DOWN THAT IS THE LANDMARK MONSANTO V. GEERTSON CASE

机译:大笔交易是什么?这就是具有里程碑意义的孟山都诉盖特森案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In June of 2010, the United States Supreme Court delivered its first ruling involving genetically modified agricultural crops. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 130 S.Ct. 2743 (2010) could have been a true landmark decision, defining the initial limits of the emotionally-charged debate over the use of genetically modified organisms ("GMOs"), and the ethical and environmental concerns associated with them. Instead, it became a lesson for the parties in standing, and a warning to the lower courts tonot expand the jurisprudence of injunctive relief in the area of environmental protection. What the Court did not say is almost more important than what it did say. And, not surprisingly in a case where the underlying issues were not really addressed, both sides claimed legitimate victories.
机译:2010年6月,美国最高法院作出了第一项涉及转基因农作物的裁决。 Monsanto Co.诉Geertson Seed Farms,130 S.Ct. 2743(2010)可能是一个真正的具有里程碑意义的决定,它定义了关于使用转基因生物(GMO)以及与之相关的道德和环境问题的情绪化辩论的最初界限。取而代之的是,这成为当事双方当选的一个教训,并警告下级法院不要扩大环境保护领域禁令救济的判例。法院没有说的话几乎比它说的重要。而且,在根本问题未得到真正解决的情况下,双方都声称取得了合法的胜利,这不足为奇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号