...
首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Effectiveness of different modalities of cognitive remediation on symptomatological, neuropsychological, and functional outcome domains in schizophrenia: a prospective study in a real-world setting.
【24h】

Effectiveness of different modalities of cognitive remediation on symptomatological, neuropsychological, and functional outcome domains in schizophrenia: a prospective study in a real-world setting.

机译:在精神分裂症的症状,神经心理和功能结局领域中,不同形式的认知矫治方法的有效性:在现实世界中的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of cognitive remediation interventions in schizophrenia has been demonstrated in several experimental studies. However, the effectiveness of such treatments in the usual setting of care of schizophrenia and a direct comparison of different modalities of interventions have not been systematically analyzed. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the cognitive subprograms of Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT-cog) and of a computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) method on symptomatological, neuropsychological and functional outcome measures in schizophrenia. METHODS: Ninety patients with schizophrenia were assigned to IPT-cog, CACR or usual rehabilitative interventions (REHAB) in a naturalistic setting of care. Clinical, neuropsychological, and functional outcome variables were assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Both the IPT-cog and CACR groups improved more than the comparison group with respect to all outcome variables. The more responsive cognitive domains were speed of processing and working memory. The effectiveness of the 2 remediation methods on the outcome dimensions considered was comparable. However, IPT-cog, but not CACR, was more effective than REHAB on speed of processing, and the CACR group had better outcome than both the REHAB and the IPT-cog groups when the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale was considered. Few correlations between neurocognitive and functional outcome changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the effectiveness, although nongeneralized, of IPT-cog and CACR in schizophrenia when applied within a psychiatric and psychosocial treatment regimen representative of the usual setting and modality of care, with no evident superiority of any of the methods, and indicates that the changes in functional outcome during treatment are modestly mediated by improvement in specific cognitive domains.
机译:目标:精神分裂症的认知修复干预措施的有效性已在一些实验研究中得到证明。然而,尚未系统分析这种治疗在精神分裂症的常规治疗中的效果以及对不同干预方式的直接比较。这项研究的目的是评估综合心理治疗(IPT-cog)的认知子程序和计算机辅助认知修复(CACR)方法在精神分裂症的症状,神经心理和功能结果测量中的有效性。方法:90名精神分裂症患者在自然疗法中被分配至IPT-cog,CACR或常规康复干预措施(REHAB)。在基线和治疗24周后评估临床,神经心理和功能结局变量。结果:就所有结果变量而言,IPT-cog和CACR组的改善均高于对照组。响应速度更快的认知领域是处理和工作记忆的速度。两种补救方法在考虑的结果维度上的有效性是可比的。但是,IPT-cog而不是CACR在处理速度上比REHAB更有效,并且考虑到国家健康状况量表的健康程度,CACR组的结果优于REHAB和IPT-cog组。神经认知和功能结果变化之间的相关性很少。结论:这项研究证明了在精神病和社会心理治疗方案中,IPT-cog和CACR在精神分裂症中的疗效,尽管未概括,但代表了通常的护理方式和方式,但没有任何方法的明显优越性,并指出在治疗过程中功能结局的变化是由特定认知领域的改善适度介导的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号