首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Comparison of metal versus absorbable implants in tension-band wiring: a preliminary study.
【24h】

Comparison of metal versus absorbable implants in tension-band wiring: a preliminary study.

机译:张力带布线中金属与可吸收植入物的比较:一项初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The strength of tension-band wiring using bioabsorbable materials versus metal implants was assessed with a rabbit knee fusion model. Ten rabbit knees were osteotomized and rigidly fixed using a tension-band technique: five with metal implants (2 pins and 24-gauge wire) and five with absorbable implants (2-mm pins [Bionx, Blue Bell, Pa] and 1 Maxon [Davis and Geck, Danbury, Conn]). Biomechanical testing of the fixation strength was completed using a servohydraulic mechanical testing machine and a specifically designed four-point bending jig. The parameters assessed were maximal load, relative stiffness, displacement, and bending moment of the constructs. Results of the biomechanical testing showed no statistical difference between the constructs on any of the parameters assessed.
机译:通过兔膝关节融合模型评估了使用生物可吸收材料而不是金属植入物的张力带布线的强度。用张力带技术将十只兔子的膝盖切骨并固定:五个带有金属植入物(2个针脚和24规格的金属丝),五个带有可吸收植入物(2毫米针脚[Bionx,Blue Bell,Pa]和1个Maxon [戴维斯和盖克(Danbury,Conn)])。使用伺服液压机械测试仪和专门设计的四点弯曲夹具完成对固定强度的生物力学测试。评估的参数是最大载荷,相对刚度,位移和结构的弯矩。生物力学测试的结果表明,在所评估的任何参数上,构造之间均无统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号