首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: Technical Note, Outcomes, and Complications
【24h】

Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: Technical Note, Outcomes, and Complications

机译:关节镜透骨性肩袖修复:技术说明,结果和并发症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The goal of this study was to review the authors' initial experience with arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair. Thirty-one patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair over a 15-month period. Preoperatively, demographics and subjective scores were recorded. Postoperatively, pain levels, subjective shoulder values, satisfaction scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, complications, and reoperations were noted with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The relationships between pre- and intraoperative variables and outcome scores were determined with univariate analysis. Average patient age was 56 years, and 23 patients (74%) were men. Twenty patients (65%) underwent primary rotator cuff repair, and 11 patients (35%) underwent revision repair. Average time to follow-up was 26 months. Average preoperative pain level and subjective shoulder value were 5.1 of 10 and 35%, respectively. Average postoperative scores included pain level of 0.9 of 10, subjective shoulder value of 84%, satisfaction score of 90.6 of 100, and ASES score of 86.3 of 100. There were 3 (9.7%) major and 2 (6%) minor complications. Patients undergoing revision rotator cuff repair had significantly worse outcomes (pain level, subjective shoulder value, ASES score; P<.05) compared with those undergoing primary repair, and cortical augmentation did not significantly affect outcome. Overall, outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair are good, although patients undergoing revision repair do not have the same outcomes as those undergoing primary cuff repair. The procedure is not without complications (9.7% major, 6% minor complications). Cortical augmentation may be used to supplement fixation, although it does not necessarily affect outcomes. Patients without such augmentation may be at increased risk for suture cutout through the bone.
机译:这项研究的目的是回顾作者在关节镜下经骨性肩袖修复的初步经验。 31例全层肩袖撕裂患者在15个月内接受了关节镜下经骨性肩袖修复。术前记录人口统计学和主观评分。术后至少两年随访,记录疼痛程度,主观肩膀值,满意度评分,美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分,并发症和再次手术。术前和术中变量与预后评分之间的关​​系通过单因素分析确定。患者平均年龄为56岁,男性为2​​3位患者(74%)。 20例(65%)接受了首次肩袖修复,11例(35%)进行了翻修。平均随访时间为26个月。术前平均疼痛水平和主观肩痛值分别为5.1(10分和35%)。术后平均评分包括疼痛水平为10分的0.9,主观肩膀值为84%,满意度为100的90.6和ASES得分为86.3的100。主要并发症为3(9.7%)和2(6%)。进行翻修肩袖修复的患者与进行初次修复的患者相比,结局明显(疼痛水平,主观肩膀值,ASES评分; P <.05)更差,而皮质增强对结局没有明显影响。总体而言,尽管进行翻修修复的患者与初次进行袖套修复的患者的结局不同,但在关节镜下经颅骨旋转袖套修复后的预后良好。该过程并非没有并发症(9.7%的严重并发症,6%的次要并发症)。皮质增强可用于补充固定,尽管不一定会影响预后。没有这种增强的患者可能会增加通过骨头缝合切口的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号