首页> 外文期刊>Orthodontics & craniofacial research >Simplified stress analysis on the temporomandibular joint in Class III patients with and without mandibular asymmetry using a rigid body spring model.
【24h】

Simplified stress analysis on the temporomandibular joint in Class III patients with and without mandibular asymmetry using a rigid body spring model.

机译:使用刚体弹簧模型,对具有和不具有下颌骨不对称性的III类患者的颞下颌关节进行简化的应力分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to investigate the differences in stress on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) between Class III patients with and without mandibular asymmetry using a rigid body spring model (RBSM). DESIGN: Menton (Me), the centre point of occlusal force on the line that connected the bilateral buccal cusps of the second molars and the most lateral, superior and medial points of the condyle were plotted on frontal cephalograms, and stress on the condyles was calculated with the 2-dimensional RBSM program of fortran. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty Japanese patients with diagnosed mandibular prognathism were divided into two groups, a symmetry group and asymmetry group on the basis of the Mx-Md midline position. OUTCOME MEASURE: The degree (force partition) of the resultant force, the direction (angulation) and displacement (X, Y) of each condyle were calculated. The horizontal displacement vector (u), the vertical displacement vector (v) and rotation angle (theta) of the mandibular body at Menton were also calculated. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the deviated and non-deviated sides of both groups regarding resultant force (symmetry group: p = 0.0372, asymmetry group: p = 0.0054), X (symmetry group: p < 0.0001, asymmetry group: p = 0.0001) and Y (symmetry group: p = 0.0354, asymmetry group: p = 0.0043). For angulation, there was a significant difference between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the asymmetry group (p = 0.0095). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that difference in stress angulation on the condyles could be associated with asymmetry in mandibular prognathism.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用刚体弹簧模型(RBSM)研究有无下颌骨不对称的III类患者对颞下颌关节(TMJ)的压力差异。设计:Menton(Me),在连接第二磨牙的双颊颊尖和and的最外侧,上方和内侧点的线上的咬合力的中心点绘制在额头脑波图上,and上的应力为使用fortran的二维RBSM程序计算得出。地点和样本人群:根据Mx-Md中线位置,将80名日本诊断为下颌前突的患者分为两组,对称组和不对称组。观察指标:计算合力的程度(力分配),每个con的方向(角度)和位移(X,Y)。还计算了Menton下颌体的水平位移矢量(u),垂直位移矢量(v)和旋转角度(θ)。结果:两组的偏侧和非偏侧在合力方面存在显着差异(对称组:p = 0.0372,不对称组:p = 0.0054),X(对称组:p <0.0001,不对称组:p = 0.0001)和Y(对称组:p = 0.0354,不对称组:p = 0.0043)。对于成角度,在不对称组中,偏斜侧和非偏斜侧之间存在显着差异(p = 0.0095)。结论:这项研究的结果表明stress突应力角度的差异可能与下颌孕育的不对称性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号