...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >Tibial coverage, meniscus position, size and damage in knees discordant for joint space narrowing - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
【24h】

Tibial coverage, meniscus position, size and damage in knees discordant for joint space narrowing - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

机译:膝关节的胫骨覆盖,半月板位置,大小和损伤与关节间隙变窄不符-骨关节炎倡议的数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Meniscal extrusion is thought to be associated with less meniscus coverage of the tibial surface, but the association of radiographic disease stage with quantitative measures of tibial plateau coverage is unknown. We therefore compared quantitative and semi-quantitative measures of meniscus position and morphology in individuals with bilateral painful knees discordant on medial joint space narrowing (mJSN). Methods: A sample of 60 participants from the first half (2,678 cases) of the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort fulfilled the inclusion criteria: bilateral frequent pain, Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) mJSN grades 1-3 in one, no-JSN in the contra-lateral (CL), and no lateral JSN in either knee (43 unilateral mJSN1; 17 mJSN2/3; 22 men, 38 women, body mass index (BMI) 31.3 ?? 3.9 kg/m2). Segmentation and three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the tibial plateau and meniscus, and semi-quantitative evaluation of meniscus damage (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis knee score = MOAKS) was performed using coronal 3T MR images (MPR DESSwe and intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo (IW-TSE) images). CL knees were compared using paired t-tests (between-knee, within-person design). Results: Medial tibial plateau coverage was 36 ?? 9% in mJSN1 vs 45 ?? 8% in CL no-JSN knees, and was 31 ?? 9% in mJSN2/3 vs 46 ?? 6% in no-JSN knees (both P 0.001). mJSN knees showed greater meniscus extrusion and damage (MOAKS), but no significant difference in meniscus volume. No significant differences in lateral tibial coverage, lateral meniscus morphology or position were observed. Conclusions: Knees with medial JSN showed substantially less medial tibial plateau coverage by the meniscus. We suggest that the less meniscal coverage, i.e., less mechanical protection may be a reason for greater rates of cartilage loss observed in JSN knees. ? 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
机译:简介:半月板挤压被认为与胫骨表面的半月板覆盖率降低有关,但放射影像学分期与胫骨平台覆盖度定量测量的相关性尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了双侧疼痛性膝关节与内侧关节间隙变窄(mJSN)不协调的个体的半月板位置和形态的定量和半定量测量。方法:从骨关节炎倡议研究队列的上半部分(2,678例)中抽取60名参与者的样本符合纳入标准:双侧频繁疼痛,国际骨关节炎研究协会(OARSI)的mJSN等级为1-3,而没有JSN -外侧(CL),且任一膝盖均无外侧JSN(43个单侧mJSN1; 17 mJSN2 / 3;男性22个,女性38个,体重指数(BMI)31.3-3.9 kg / m2)。使用冠状3T MR图像(MPR DESSwe和中等加权涡轮增压)对胫骨平台和半月板进行分割和三维定量分析,并对半月板损伤进行半定量评估(磁共振成像(MRI)骨关节炎膝关节评分= MOAKS)自旋回波(IW-TSE)图像)。使用成对的t检验(双膝间,人内设计)比较CL膝。结果:胫骨内侧平台覆盖度为36? mJSN1中为9%,而45 ?? CL no-JSN膝盖中的8%为31 ??。 mJSN2 / 3中为9%,而46 ??在非JSN膝盖中占6%(均P <0.001)。 mJSN膝关节表现出更大的半月板挤压和损伤(MOAKS),但半月板体积无明显差异。没有观察到胫骨外侧覆盖,外侧半月板形态或位置的显着差异。结论:内侧JSN膝关节半月板对胫骨平台内侧的覆盖明显较少。我们建议较少的半月板覆盖,即较少的机械保护可能是在JSN膝盖中观察到较高的软骨损失率的原因。 ? 2012年国际骨关节炎研究学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号