首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling.
【24h】

Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling.

机译:一步骤和两步自蚀刻粘合剂在硬化性牙本质上的微拉伸粘合强度:热循环的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluated the effects of thermocycling on the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives (SEAs) to sclerotic dentin. Two adhesives, Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), a one-step self-etch adhesive (1-SEA), and Clearfil SE Bond (SE), a two-step self-etch adhesive (2-SEA), were applied on cervical lesions in human premolars with sclerotic or normal dentin. After adhesive application, the lesions were restored and built up using a resin composite (Clearfil AP-X). After 24 hours in water storage, the restored teeth were sectioned into 0.7 x 0.7 mm composite-dentin beams. The beams were then aged with 0, 5,000 or 10,000 thermocycles. The use of two adhesives, two substrate types and three thermocycling regimens yielded 12 experimental groups of 14-19 beams each. The beams were subsequently subjected to microTBS testing at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute and statistical analyses were computed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at p < 0.05. Three-way ANOVA showed statistically significant effects on bonding effectiveness by lesion type, adhesive system, thermocycling or combinations of the adhesive system and thermocycling (p < 0.05). With sclerotic dentin, although S3 and SE provided comparable microTBS after 24 hours of water storage, S3 showed significantly lower microTBS than SE after thermocycling (p < 0.05). Regardless of lesion type, the microTBS for S3 decreased significantly after 5,000 or 10,000 thermocycles, while the microTBS for SE showed a significant decrease only after 10,000 thermocycles. Regardless of the extent of thermocycling, the microTBS values for either SE or S3 bonded to sclerotic dentin were significantly lower than to normal dentin (p < 0.05). The results suggested that thermocycling had a significant negative effect on the bond strength of the two SEAs tested. In contrast to 2-SEA, 1-SEA might not be a good choice for sclerotic dentin when seeking durability of the resin-dentin bond.
机译:这项研究评估了热循环对硬化性牙本质的一步和两步自蚀刻粘合剂(SEA)的微拉伸粘合强度(microTBS)的影响。将两种粘合剂,即Clearfil S3 Bond(S3)(一步法自蚀刻粘合剂)(1-SEA)和Clearfil SE Bond(SE),即两步自蚀刻粘合剂(2-SEA)涂在宫颈上人硬化性或正常牙本质的前磨牙病变。涂上粘合剂后,使用树脂复合材料(Clearfil AP-X)修复并形成病变。储水24小时后,将修复的牙齿切成0.7 x 0.7 mm的复合牙本质梁。然后,将梁用0、5,000或10,000个热循环进行老化。两种粘合剂,两种基材类型和三种热循环方案的使用产生了12组实验组,每组14-19束。随后对光束以1 mm / min的十字头速度进行microTBS测试,并使用三向ANOVA和Tukey事后测试在p <0.05的条件下进行统计分析。三效方差分析显示,通过病变类型,黏合剂系统,热循环或黏合剂系统和热循环的组合,对粘合效果具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。对于硬化性牙本质,尽管S3和SE在储水24小时后提供了可比的microTBS,但在热循环后S3的microTBS显着低于SE(p <0.05)。不论病变类型如何,S3的microTBS在5,0​​00或10,000个热循环后均显着下降,而SE的microTBS仅在10,000个热循环后才显着下降。无论热循环的程度如何,与硬化性牙本质结合的SE或S3的microTBS值均显着低于正常牙本质(p <0.05)。结果表明,热循环对两种测试的SEA的粘合强度均具有显着的负面影响。与2-SEA相反,当寻求树脂-牙本质键的耐久性时,1-SEA可能不是硬化性牙本质的理想选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号