...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema.
【24h】

Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema.

机译:雷尼珠单抗加速激或延缓激光或曲安西龙加速激激光对糖尿病性黄斑水肿的2年扩展随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To report expanded 2-year follow-up of a previously reported randomized trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab or 4 mg triamcinolone combined with focal/grid laser compared with focal/grid laser alone for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 854 study eyes of 691 participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea. METHODS: Continuation of procedures previously reported for the randomized trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 2-year visit. RESULTS: At the 2-year visit, compared with the sham + prompt laser group, the mean change in the visual acuity letter score from baseline was 3.7 letters greater in the ranibizumab + prompt laser group (95% confidence interval adjusted for multiple comparisons [aCI], -0.4 to +7.7), 5.8 letters greater in the ranibizumab + deferred laser group (95% aCI, +1.9 to +9.8), and 1.5 letters worse in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group (95% aCI, -5.5 to +2.4). After the 1- to 2-year visit in the ranibizumab + prompt or deferred laser groups, the median numbers of injections were 2 and 3 (potential maximum of 13), respectively. At the 2-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness >/=250 mum were 59% in the sham + prompt laser group, 43% in the ranibizumab + prompt laser group, 42% in the ranibizumab + deferred laser group, and 52% in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group. No systemic events attributable to study treatment were apparent. Three eyes in 3 (0.8%) of 375 participants had injection-related endophthalmitis in the ranibizumab groups, whereas elevated intraocular pressure and cataract surgery were more frequent in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group. CONCLUSIONS: The expanded 2-year results reported are similar to results published previously and reinforce the conclusions originally reported: Ranibizumab should be considered for patients with DME and characteristics similar to those of the cohort in this clinical trial, including vision impairment with DME involving the center of the macula.
机译:目的:报告一项先前报道的随机试验的扩大的两年随访,该试验评估玻璃体腔内0.5 mg雷珠单抗或4 mg曲安西龙联合聚焦/栅格激光治疗与单独的聚焦/栅格激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)。设计:多中心随机临床试验。参与者:共有691名参与者的854眼研究视力为20/32至20/320(约等于Snellen视力),DME累及中央凹。方法:继续先前报道的随机试验程序。主要观察指标:2年随访时最佳矫正视力和安全性。结果:在2年的随访中,与假手术+快速激光组相比,兰尼单抗+快速激光组的视力字母得分与基线相比的平均变化大3.7个字母(95%置信区间为多次比较调整[ [aCI],-0.4至+7.7),兰尼单抗+延迟激光治疗组(5.8%,aCI大于+1.9至+9.8)大5.8个字母,曲安西龙+即时激光治疗组(95%aCI,-5.5),差1.5个字母至+2.4)。在兰尼单抗+迅速或延迟激光治疗组中进行1至2年随访后,注射的中位数分别为2次和3次(潜在最大值13次)。在为期2年的随访中,假手术+即时激光组的中央子场厚度> / = 250毫米的眼睛百分比为59%,兰尼单抗+即时激光组为43%,兰尼单抗+延迟激光组为42% ,而曲安西龙+即时激光治疗组为52%。没有明显的可归因于研究治疗的全身性事件。兰尼单抗组的375名参与者中有3只眼(0.8%)患有注射相关性眼内炎,而曲安奈德+激光即时治疗组眼内压升高和白内障手术更为频繁。结论:报告的扩大的2年结果与之前发表的结果相似,并强化了最初报道的结论:对于DME患者,应考虑使用Ranibizumab,其特征应与本临床试验的队列研究相似,包括DME引起的视力障碍黄斑中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号