首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery >Implant infection in porous orbital implants.
【24h】

Implant infection in porous orbital implants.

机译:多孔眼眶植入物中的植入物感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To analyze implant infection in patients with porous orbital implants. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 212 patients with one of five types of porous orbital implants (bone-derived hydroxyapatite [HA], coralline HA, synthetic HA, porous polyethylene, and aluminium oxide) was conducted. Reasons for surgery, type of surgery, type of implant, peg system used, time of pegging, problems before and after pegging, treatment, and follow-up duration were recorded for all patients, along with additional data including time of onset of infection, microorganism cultured, antibiotics used, patient response to antibiotic therapy, additional interventions, and final status for patients with infection. RESULTS: Of the 212 patients with porous orbital implants, 116 (54.72%) were pegged. Implant infection was observed in 11 of 116 patients (9.48%) with pegs, whereas 0% of unpegged implants was infected (p = 0.001). The interval between pegging and the onset of infection was 3 to 83 months (average, 36.27 +/- 29.12 months). Implant exposure was noted in 5 of the 11 patients with infection. Symptoms resolved completely with antibiotic treatment in 7 patients. One patient required implant removal as the result of frequent exacerbations. The remaining 3 patients presented with hemorrhagic, purulent discharge and/or pyogenic granuloma on their last visits after being free of symptoms for 5 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Implant infection is a serious problem that requires additional patient visits, intensive antibiotic therapy, surgery, or some combination of these. Existence of a peg system appears to play a role in implant infection. Infection may develop as late as 6 to 7 years after pegging, and the patient should be cautioned about potential late-onset problems. It is possible to control the infection with appropriate antibiotic therapy; removal should be reserved for refractory cases.
机译:目的:分析多孔眼眶植入物患者的植入物感染情况。方法:对212例患者进行回顾性分析,其中包括五种类型的多孔眶植入物(骨源性羟基磷灰石[HA],珊瑚碱HA,合成HA,多孔聚乙烯和氧化铝)。记录所有患者的手术原因,手术类型,植入物类型,使用的钉钉系统,钉钉时间,钉钉前后的问题,治疗以及随访时间,并记录其他数据,包括感染的开始时间,培养的微生物,使用的抗生素,患者对抗生素治疗的反应,其他干预措施以及感染患者的最终状况。结果:在212例多孔性眼眶植入物患者中,有116例(54.72%)被钉住。 116例患者中有11例(9.48%)发生了钉子感染,而未钉住的植入物中有0%被感染(p = 0.001)。钉住和感染发作之间的间隔为3到83个月(平均36.27 +/- 29.12个月)。 11名感染患者中有5名发现了植入物暴露。使用抗生素治疗后,症状完全消失7例。由于频繁加重,一名患者需要移除种植体。其余3例患者在无症状持续5至6个月后的最后一次就诊时出现出血,化脓性分泌物和/或化脓性肉芽肿。结论:种植体感染是一个严重的问题,需要额外的患者就诊,强化抗生素治疗,手术或以上各项的组合。钉子系统的存在似乎在植入物感染中起作用。钉住后的6到7年内可能会发生感染,应提醒患者注意潜在的迟发性问题。通过适当的抗生素治疗可以控制感染;切除应保留给难治性病例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号