BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Porous anophthalmic orbital implants are used widely. This study evaluates risk factors for porous anophthalmic orbital implant complications and compares complication rates of hydroxyapatite, porous polyethylene, and polyglactin mesh-wrapped aluminum oxide implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 105 patients (110 eyes) who received porous anophthalmic orbital implants for any indication were reviewed retrospectively. Complications were recorded and correlated with potential risk factors, including implant material. All patient records were de-identified to protect privacy. RESULTS: Porous polyethylene and aluminum oxide implants were associated with higher exposure rates (porous polyethylene: odds ratio 6.1 [1.29, 29.1]; aluminum oxide: odds ratio 6.0 [1.58, 23.1]; P = .004) and higher overall complication rates compared to hydroxyapatite implants. CONCLUSION: Implant material may be a risk factor for several anophthalmic clinical outcomes.
展开▼
机译：背景与目的：多孔性眼眶植入物被广泛使用。这项研究评估了多孔性眼科眶植入物并发症的危险因素，并比较了羟基磷灰石，多孔聚乙烯和聚乳胶网状包裹的氧化铝植入物的并发症发生率。患者与方法：回顾性分析了105例（110眼）接受多孔多孔性眼眶植入物治疗的患者的病历。记录并发症并与包括植入物材料在内的潜在危险因素相关。所有患者记录均被取消标识以保护隐私。结果：多孔聚乙烯和氧化铝植入物与较高的暴露率相关（多孔聚乙烯：优势比6.1 [1.29，29.1];氧化铝：优势比6.0 [1.58，23.1]; P = .004）和更高的总体并发症发生率羟基磷灰石植入物。结论：植入物可能是几种眼科临床结果的危险因素。
展开▼
