首页> 外文期刊>Cell >Grant review: American Idol or big brother?
【24h】

Grant review: American Idol or big brother?

机译:格兰特评论:美国偶像还是哥哥?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is little doubt that the current NIH grant review system is not perfect But this is true for any nondeter-ministic process, including scientific manuscript review, content consensus in collaborative web environments, the refeering of sports events, and debates surrounding issues of health or education. Any process that has broad ramifications and requires a frequent, repetitive, and community-based decision will have to be consistent and fair but also agile and dynamic.
机译:毫无疑问,当前的NIH拨款审查系统并不完美,但这对于任何不确定的过程都是正确的,包括科学手稿审查,协作网络环境中的内容共识,体育赛事的抗辩以及围绕健康或健康问题的辩论教育。任何具有广泛影响并需要频繁,重复且基于社区的决策的过程都必须是一致且公平的,而且还必须灵活且充满活力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号