首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:剖宫产时子宫外在化与原位修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare extra-abdominal to intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Instituto Materno-Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira (Recife, Brazil). Inclusion criteria were indication for cesarean delivery and gestational age of 24 weeks or more. Patients with two or more cesarean deliveries, chorioamnionitis, hemorrhage, inability to consent, and previous abdominal surgery were excluded. Variables analyzed were nausea, vomiting, mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of surgical sutures for uterine repair, postoperative pain evaluated by the visual analog scale, number of postoperative analgesic doses, surgical site infection, and endometritis. RESULTS: The analysis included 325 patients randomized for exteriorized uterine repair and 312 patients randomized for in situ uterine repair. A significant difference was observed in duration of surgery: lasting less than 45 minutes (44% with exteriorized uterus compared with 35.3% with in situ uterus, P=.02; number needed to treat=12) and less need of sutures (18.2% requiring one suture in the exteriorized group compared with 11.9% in the in situ group, P=.03; number needed to treat=16). The frequency of moderate or severe pain 6 hours after surgery was higher in women with exteriorized repair (23.1%) when compared with those who underwent in situ repair (32.6%) (P=.026; number needed to treat=11). There was no difference between the groups in relation to other variables. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between extra-abdominal and intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery, but the number of sutures is lower and surgical time is shorter with extra-abdominal repair, although moderate and severe pain at 6 hours is less frequent with in situ uterine repair. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00550888 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
机译:目的:比较剖宫产时子宫切口的腹外修复与腹内修复的比较。方法:这是由Materno-Infantil研究所的Fernando Figueira教授(巴西累西腓)进行的随机对照试验。纳入标准是剖宫产和24周或以上胎龄的指征。排除两次或两次以上剖宫产,绒毛膜羊膜炎,出血,无法同意和先前腹部手术的患者。分析的变量包括恶心,呕吐,平均手术时间,术中失血,用于子宫修复的手术缝合线数量,通过视觉模拟量表评估的术后疼痛,术后止痛剂量的数量,手术部位感染和子宫内膜炎。结果:该分析包括325例随机化的外部子宫修复患者和312例随机的原位子宫修复患者。观察到手术时间的显着差异:持续时间少于45分钟(子宫外翻为44%,原位子宫为35.3%,P = .02;需要治疗的数量= 12)和缝合需求较少(18.2%在外用组中需要缝合一次,而在原位组中则需要11.9%,P = .03;需要治疗的数量= 16)。与接受原位修复的妇女(32.6%)相比,进行外部修复的妇女在术后6小时中度或严重疼痛的频率更高(23.1%)(P = .026;需要治疗的人数= 11)。两组之间在其他变量方面没有差异。结论:剖宫产时子宫切口的腹腔外和腹腔内修复之间没有显着差异,但是腹腔外修复的缝合线数量较少,手术时间较短,尽管6小时时出现中度和重度疼痛原位子宫修复的频率较低。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT00550888证据级别:I.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号