首页> 中文期刊>世界核心医学期刊文摘:妇产科学分册 >比较子宫肌瘤栓塞术与肌瘤切除术在欲保留生育能力妇女的疗效差异:一项随机对照试验的初步结果

比较子宫肌瘤栓塞术与肌瘤切除术在欲保留生育能力妇女的疗效差异:一项随机对照试验的初步结果

     

摘要

Objective: To compare the clinical results of surgical and endovascular treatment of uterine myomas in young women. Study design: In a university-affiliated, tertiary care center a prospective trial was conducted. Sixty-three women, wishing to retain fertility, with intramural fibroid(s) larger than 4 cm, were randomly selected either for uterine artery embolization or myomectomy. Invasiveness, efficacy, and complications of both procedures were compared. Results: Thirty embolizations and 33 myomectomies (15 laparoscopic, 18 open) were performed. The mean follow-up was 17 months. In embolized patients, there was a significantly shorter procedure length (p < 0.0001), hospital stay (p < 0.001) and disability period (p < 0.0001), lower CRP (p < 0.001) and higher hemoglobin (p < 0.0001) concentrations the 2nd day after procedure. But there was a higher incidence of reinterventions (p < 0.01) and a lower rate of total symptomatic relief (p < 0.1). The groups did not significantly differ in: technical success rate, febrile morbidity, FSH levels 6 months after the procedure, and complication rates. Conclusions: Although the reproductive outcomes of uterine artery embolization and myomectomy cannot be evaluated at the moment, our first results indicate that both methods are clinically successful in the majority of cases and are not connected with significant number of serious complications.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号