首页> 外文会议>American College of Veterinary Surgeons Veterinary Symposium >RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING TWO TECHNIQUES FOR CRANIAL CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPAIR
【24h】

RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING TWO TECHNIQUES FOR CRANIAL CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPAIR

机译:随机,受控,临床试验比较颅骨十字韧带修复两种技术

获取原文

摘要

There is controversy surrounding which surgical procedure is most beneficial. Many board certified surgeons believe that TPLO's provide a better outcome without scientific evidence.Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled, clinical trial comparing the LFS technique and the TPLO. Eighty dogs were randomized and stratified based on size. To be included, dogs had unilateral surgically confirmed cruciate disease with no clinical signs of other orthopedic or medical disease at the time of entrance. The Canine Brief Pain Inventory owner survey, thigh circumference, goniometry, and pressure platform gait analysis were completed prior to surgery, at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after surgery.
机译:周围有争议的外科手术是最有益的。许多董事会认证的外科医生认为,TPLO在没有科学证据的情况下提供更好的结果。材料和方法:本研究是一个比较LFS技术和TPLO的随机,受控,临床试验。八十只狗基于尺寸随机分析。要包括在内,狗在入口时没有临床症状,没有其他整形外科或医疗疾病的临床症状。犬短暂止痛库存所有者调查,大腿周长,焦管测定和压力平台步态分析在手术前完成,在手术后6周,12周,6个月和1年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号